[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bc6ed6d-31e9-4b44-aa91-5f9d0f3d92c8@sangfor.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:25:01 +0800
From: Shifeng Li <lishifeng@...gfor.com.cn>
To: Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: leon@...nel.org, wenglianfa@...wei.com, gustavoars@...nel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shifeng Li <lishifeng1992@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/device: Fix a race between mad_client and cm_client
init
On 2024/1/16 10:12, Ding Hui wrote:
> On 2024/1/15 21:47, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 10:12:17AM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
>>> On 2024/1/4 20:37, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 02:48:14PM +0800, Shifeng Li wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The root cause is that mad_client and cm_client may init concurrently
>>>>> when devices_rwsem write semaphore is downgraded in enable_device_and_get() like:
>>>>
>>>> That can't be true, the module loader infrastructue ensures those two
>>>> things are sequential.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please consider the sequence again and notice that:
>>>
>>> 1. We agree that dependencies ensure mad_client be registered before cm_client.
>>> 2. But the mad_client.add() is not invoked in ib_register_client(), since
>>> there is no DEVICE_REGISTERED device at that time.
>>> Instead, it will be delayed until the device driver init (e.g. mlx5_core)
>>> in enable_device_and_get().
>>> 3. The ib_cm and mlx5_core can be loaded concurrently, after setting DEVICE_REGISTERED
>>> and downgrade_write(&devices_rwsem) in enable_device_and_get(), there is a chance
>>> that cm_client.add() can be invoked before mad_client.add().
>>>
>>>
>>> T1(ib_core init) | T2(device driver init) | T3(ib_cm init)
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ib_register_client mad_client
>>> assign_client_id
>>> add clients CLIENT_REGISTERED
>>> (with clients_rwsem write)
>>> down_read(&devices_rwsem);
>>> xa_for_each_marked (&devices, DEVICE_REGISTERED)
>>> nop # no devices
>>> up_read(&devices_rwsem);
>>>
>>> ib_register_device
>>> enable_device_and_get
>>> down_write(&devices_rwsem);
>>> set DEVICE_REGISTERED
>>> downgrade_write(&devices_rwsem);
>>> ib_register_client cm_client
>>> assign_client_id
>>> add clients CLIENT_REGISTERED
>>> (with clients_rwsem write)
>>> down_read(&devices_rwsem);
>>> xa_for_each_marked (&devices, DEVICE_REGISTERED)
>>> add_client_context
>>> down_write(&device->client_data_rwsem);
>>> get CLIENT_DATA_REGISTERED
>>> downgrade_write(&device->client_data_rwsem);
>>> cm_client.add
>>> cm_add_one
>>> ib_register_mad_agent
>>> ib_get_mad_port
>>> __ib_get_mad_port return NULL!
>>> set CLIENT_DATA_REGISTERED
>>> up_read(&device->client_data_rwsem);
>>> up_read(&devices_rwsem);
>>> down_read(&clients_rwsem);
>>> xa_for_each_marked (&clients, CLIENT_REGISTERED)
>>> add_client_context [mad]
>>> mad_client.add
>>> add_client_context [cm]
>>> nop # already CLIENT_DATA_REGISTERED
>>> up_read(&clients_rwsem);
>>> up_read(&devices_rwsem);
>>
>> Take the draft I sent previously and use down_write(&devices_rwsem) in
>> ib_register_client()
>>
>
> I believe this modification is effective, rather than expanding the clients_rwsem range,
> the key point is down_write(&devices_rwsem), which prevents ib_register_client() from
> being executed in the gap of ib_register_device().
>
> However, this may cause a little confusion, as ib_register_client() does not modify
> anything related to devices, but it is protected by a write lock.
>
Hi Jason,
Do you have any differing opinions about above?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists