[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e1ec730efc58f17ecf008a4600321e3d200ebda.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 20:58:16 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer
<tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, libc-alpha@...rceware.org,
regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Strange EFAULT on mips64el returned by syscall when another
thread is forking
On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 12:33 +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>
> 在2024年1月24日一月 上午10:42,Xi Ruoyao写道:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I'm testing Glibc master branch for upcoming 2.39 release, I
> > noticed an alarming test failure on mips64el:
>
> So apparently it should be tracked as a regression.
>
> #regzbot ^introduced 4bce37a68ff884e821a02a731897a8119e0c37b7
>
> Should we revert it for now?
I'd say "yes" if we cannot easily patch instruction_pointer() to handle
delay slot. Anyway the reversion will be a MIPS-only change.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists