lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a751acaa-16f2-40eb-ab1b-7e1e5d937a2b@foss.st.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:39:33 +0100
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Jens Wiklander
	<jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] remoteproc: Add TEE support

Hi Mathieu,

On 1/25/24 19:55, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Arnaud,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:04:30AM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
>>
>> Add a remoteproc TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) device
> 
> Device or driver?  Seems to be the latter...

Right, driver is better

> 
>> that will be probed by the TEE bus. If the associated Trusted
>> application is supported on secure part this device offers a client
>> interface to load a firmware in the secure part.
>> This firmware could be authenticated and decrypted by the secure
>> trusted application.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig          |   9 +
>>  drivers/remoteproc/Makefile         |   1 +
>>  drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c | 393 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h      |  99 +++++++
>>  4 files changed, 502 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c
>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> index 48845dc8fa85..85299606806c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> @@ -365,6 +365,15 @@ config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
>>  
>>  	  It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
>>  
>> +
>> +config TEE_REMOTEPROC
>> +	tristate "trusted firmware support by a TEE application"
>> +	depends on OPTEE
>> +	help
>> +	  Support for trusted remote processors firmware. The firmware
>> +	  authentication and/or decryption are managed by a trusted application.
>> +	  This can be either built-in or a loadable module.
>> +
>>  endif # REMOTEPROC
>>  
>>  endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> index 91314a9b43ce..fa8daebce277 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RCAR_REMOTEPROC)		+= rcar_rproc.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC)		+= st_remoteproc.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC)	+= st_slim_rproc.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC)		+= stm32_rproc.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_TEE_REMOTEPROC)		+= tee_remoteproc.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC)	+= ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC)	+= ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC)	+= xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..49e1e0caf889
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,393 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2023 - All Rights Reserved
>> + * Author: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
>> +#include <linux/tee_remoteproc.h>
>> +
>> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>> +
>> +#define MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER	4
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Authentication of the firmware and load in the remote processor memory
>> + *
>> + * [in]  params[0].value.a:	unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor
>> + * [in]	 params[1].memref:	buffer containing the image of the buffer
>> + */
>> +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_LOAD_FW		1
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Start the remote processor
>> + *
>> + * [in]  params[0].value.a:	unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor
>> + */
>> +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_START_FW	2
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Stop the remote processor
>> + *
>> + * [in]  params[0].value.a:	unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor
>> + */
>> +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_STOP_FW		3
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Return the address of the resource table, or 0 if not found
>> + * No check is done to verify that the address returned is accessible by
>> + * the non secure context. If the resource table is loaded in a protected
>> + * memory the access by the non secure context will lead to a data abort.
>> + *
>> + * [in]  params[0].value.a:	unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor
>> + * [out]  params[1].value.a:	32bit LSB resource table memory address
>> + * [out]  params[1].value.b:	32bit MSB resource table memory address
>> + * [out]  params[2].value.a:	32bit LSB resource table memory size
>> + * [out]  params[2].value.b:	32bit MSB resource table memory size
>> + */
>> +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_GET_RSC_TABLE	4
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Return the address of the core dump
>> + *
>> + * [in]  params[0].value.a:	unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor
>> + * [out] params[1].memref:	address of the core dump image if exist,
>> + *				else return Null
>> + */
>> +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_GET_COREDUMP	5
>> +
>> +struct tee_rproc_mem {
>> +	char name[20];
>> +	void __iomem *cpu_addr;
>> +	phys_addr_t bus_addr;
>> +	u32 dev_addr;
>> +	size_t size;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct tee_rproc_context {
>> +	struct list_head sessions;
>> +	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct tee_rproc_context *tee_rproc_ctx;
>> +
>> +static void prepare_args(struct tee_rproc *trproc, int cmd, struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg *arg,
>> +			 struct tee_param *param, unsigned int num_params)
>> +{
>> +	memset(arg, 0, sizeof(*arg));
>> +	memset(param, 0, MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER * sizeof(*param));
>> +
>> +	arg->func = cmd;
>> +	arg->session = trproc->session_id;
>> +	arg->num_params = num_params + 1;
>> +
>> +	param[0] = (struct tee_param) {
>> +		.attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT,
>> +		.u.value.a = trproc->rproc_id,
>> +	};
>> +}
>> +
>> +int tee_rproc_load_fw(struct tee_rproc *trproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> +{
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>> +	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER];
>> +	struct tee_shm *fw_shm;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	fw_shm = tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, (void *)fw->data, fw->size);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(fw_shm))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(fw_shm);
>> +
>> +	prepare_args(trproc, TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_LOAD_FW, &arg, param, 1);
>> +
>> +	/* Provide the address of the firmware image */
>> +	param[1] = (struct tee_param) {
>> +		.attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INPUT,
>> +		.u.memref = {
>> +			.shm = fw_shm,
>> +			.size = fw->size,
>> +			.shm_offs = 0,
>> +		},
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
>> +	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
>> +		dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev,
>> +			"TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_LOAD_FW invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n",
>> +			arg.ret, ret);
>> +		if (!ret)
>> +			ret = -EIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tee_shm_free(fw_shm);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_load_fw);
>> +
>> +int rproc_tee_get_rsc_table(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>> +	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER];
>> +	struct rproc *rproc = trproc->rproc;
>> +	size_t rsc_size;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	prepare_args(trproc, TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_GET_RSC_TABLE, &arg, param, 2);
>> +
>> +	param[1].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT;
>> +	param[2].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT;
>> +
>> +	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
>> +	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
>> +		dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev,
>> +			"TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_GET_RSC_TABLE invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n",
>> +			arg.ret, ret);
>> +		return -EIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	rsc_size = param[2].u.value.a;
>> +
>> +	/* If the size is null no resource table defined in the image */
>> +	if (!rsc_size)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	/* Store the resource table address that would be updated by the remote core . */
>> +	trproc->rsc_va = ioremap_wc(param[1].u.value.a, rsc_size);
>> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(trproc->rsc_va)) {
>> +		dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev, "Unable to map memory region: %lld+%zx\n",
>> +			param[1].u.value.a, rsc_size);
>> +		trproc->rsc_va = NULL;
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * A cached table is requested as the physical address is not mapped yet
>> +	 * but remoteproc needs to parse the table for resources.
>> +	 */
>> +	rproc->cached_table = kmemdup((__force void *)trproc->rsc_va, rsc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!rproc->cached_table)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
>> +	rproc->table_sz = rsc_size;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rproc_tee_get_rsc_table);
>> +
>> +struct resource_table *tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	return (__force struct resource_table *)trproc->rsc_va;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table);
>> +
>> +int tee_rproc_start(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>> +	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER];
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	prepare_args(trproc, TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_START_FW, &arg, param, 0);
>> +
>> +	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
>> +	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
>> +		dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev,
>> +			"TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_START_FW invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n",
>> +			arg.ret, ret);
>> +		if (!ret)
>> +			ret = -EIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_start);
>> +
>> +int tee_rproc_stop(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>> +	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER];
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	prepare_args(trproc, TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_STOP_FW, &arg, param, 0);
>> +
>> +	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
>> +	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
>> +		dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev,
>> +			"TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_STOP_FW invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n",
>> +			arg.ret, ret);
>> +		if (!ret)
>> +			ret = -EIO;
>> +	}
>> +	if (trproc->rsc_va)
>> +		iounmap(trproc->rsc_va);
>> +	trproc->rsc_va = NULL;
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_stop);
>> +
>> +static const struct tee_client_device_id stm32_tee_rproc_id_table[] = {
>> +	{UUID_INIT(0x80a4c275, 0x0a47, 0x4905,
>> +		   0x82, 0x85, 0x14, 0x86, 0xa9, 0x77, 0x1a, 0x08)},
>> +	{}
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct tee_rproc *tee_rproc_register(struct device *dev, unsigned int rproc_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct tee_client_device *rproc_tee_device;
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg;
>> +	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER];
>> +	struct tee_rproc *trproc;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The device is not probed by the TEE bus. We ignore the reason (bus could be not yet
>> +	 * probed or service not available in the secure firmware)
>> +	 * Assumption here is that the TEE bus is not probed.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!tee_rproc_ctx)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>> +
>> +	trproc =  devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*trproc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!trproc)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> +	rproc_tee_device = to_tee_client_device(tee_rproc_ctx->dev);
>> +	memset(&sess_arg, 0, sizeof(sess_arg));
>> +
>> +	/* Open session with rproc_tee load the OP-TEE Trusted Application */
>> +	memcpy(sess_arg.uuid, rproc_tee_device->id.uuid.b, TEE_IOCTL_UUID_LEN);
>> +
>> +	sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL;
>> +	sess_arg.num_params = 1;
>> +
>> +	param[0] = (struct tee_param) {
>> +		.attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT,
>> +		.u.value.a = rproc_id,
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	ret = tee_client_open_session(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &sess_arg, param);
>> +	if (ret < 0 || sess_arg.ret != 0) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "tee_client_open_session failed, err: %x\n", sess_arg.ret);
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	trproc->parent =  dev;
>> +	trproc->rproc_id = rproc_id;
>> +	trproc->session_id = sess_arg.session;
>> +
>> +	list_add_tail(&trproc->node, &tee_rproc_ctx->sessions);
>> +
>> +	return trproc;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_register);
>> +
>> +int tee_rproc_unregister(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!tee_rproc_ctx)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	ret = tee_client_close_session(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, trproc->session_id);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		dev_err(trproc->parent,	"tee_client_close_session failed, err: %x\n", ret);
>> +
>> +	list_del(&trproc->node);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_unregister);
>> +
>> +static int tee_ctx_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
>> +{
>> +	/* Today we support only the OP-TEE, could be extend to other tees */
>> +	return (ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_OPTEE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tee_rproc_probe(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Only one RPROC OP-TEE device allowed */
>> +	if (tee_rproc_ctx) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "An RPROC OP-TEE device was already initialized: only one allowed\n");
>> +		return -EBUSY;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Open context with TEE driver */
>> +	tee_ctx = tee_client_open_context(NULL, tee_ctx_match, NULL, NULL);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(tee_ctx))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(tee_ctx);
>> +
>> +	tee_rproc_ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tee_ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!tee_ctx) {
>> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tee_rproc_ctx->dev = dev;
>> +	tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx = tee_ctx;
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tee_rproc_ctx->sessions);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +err:
>> +	tee_client_close_context(tee_ctx);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tee_rproc_remove(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct tee_rproc *entry, *tmp;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &tee_rproc_ctx->sessions, node) {
>> +		tee_client_close_session(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, entry->session_id);
>> +		list_del(&entry->node);
>> +		kfree(entry);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tee_client_close_context(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(tee, stm32_tee_rproc_id_table);
>> +
>> +static struct tee_client_driver tee_rproc_fw_driver = {
>> +	.id_table	= stm32_tee_rproc_id_table,
>> +	.driver		= {
>> +		.name		= KBUILD_MODNAME,
>> +		.bus		= &tee_bus_type,
>> +		.probe		= tee_rproc_probe,
>> +		.remove		= tee_rproc_remove,
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init tee_rproc_fw_mod_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	return driver_register(&tee_rproc_fw_driver.driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit tee_rproc_fw_mod_exit(void)
>> +{
>> +	driver_unregister(&tee_rproc_fw_driver.driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(tee_rproc_fw_mod_init);
>> +module_exit(tee_rproc_fw_mod_exit);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(" TEE remote processor control driver");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> diff --git a/include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h b/include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..537d6dc3b858
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright(c) 2023 STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef TEE_REMOTEPROC_H
>> +#define TEE_REMOTEPROC_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>> +#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct tee_rproc - TEE remoteproc structure
>> + * @node:		Reference in list
>> + * @rproc:		Remoteproc reference
>> + * @parent:		Parent device
>> + * @rproc_id:		Identifier of the target firmware
>> + * @session_id:		TEE session identifier
>> + * @rsc_va:		Resource table virtual address.
>> + */
>> +struct tee_rproc {
>> +	struct list_head node;
>> +	struct rproc *rproc;
>> +	struct device *parent;
>> +	u32 rproc_id;
>> +	u32 session_id;
>> +	void __iomem *rsc_va;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEE_REMOTEPROC)
>> +
>> +struct tee_rproc *tee_rproc_register(struct device *dev, unsigned int rproc_id);
>> +int tee_rproc_unregister(struct tee_rproc *trproc);
>> +
>> +int tee_rproc_load_fw(struct tee_rproc *trproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>> +int rproc_tee_get_rsc_table(struct tee_rproc *trproc);
> 
> Shouldn't this be tee_rproc_get_rsc_table()?  Why the exception?

No reason, just a miss during concatenation of patches to prepare the series.
I will change this.

> 
>> +struct resource_table *tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct tee_rproc *trproc);
>> +int tee_rproc_start(struct tee_rproc *trproc);
>> +int tee_rproc_stop(struct tee_rproc *trproc);
>> +
>> +#else
>> +
>> +static inline struct tee_rproc *tee_rproc_register(struct device *dev, unsigned int rproc_id)
>> +{
>> +	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int tee_rproc_unregister(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	/* This shouldn't be possible */
> 
> Why can't this be possible?  Looking at the Kconfig file it seems entirely
> plausible to compile stm32_rproc without TEE_REMOTEPROC...

This sentence is copied from rpmsg.h [1]. It is not possible to call the API if
the TEE_REMOTEPROC is not set, as an error is returned by tee_rproc_register.
Therefore, we should not fall into a state where we call this API or another one.

[1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7.1/source/include/linux/rpmsg.h#L218

Thanks,
Arnaud

> 
> More comments to come tomorrow or on Monday.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
>> +	WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int tee_rproc_load_fw(struct tee_rproc *trproc,
>> +				    const struct firmware *fw)
>> +{
>> +	/* This shouldn't be possible */
>> +	WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int tee_rproc_start(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	/* This shouldn't be possible */
>> +	WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int tee_rproc_stop(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	/* This shouldn't be possible */
>> +	WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int rproc_tee_get_rsc_table(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	/* This shouldn't be possible */
>> +	WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct resource_table *
>> +	tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct tee_rproc *trproc)
>> +{
>> +	/* This shouldn't be possible */
>> +	WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_TEE_REMOTEPROC */
>> +#endif /* TEE_REMOTEPROC_H */
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ