linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 04/17] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: add EyeQ5 OLB system controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e48f3bd8-6231-448c-8540-bb211c49c2ac@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:54:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rafał Miłecki
 <rafal@...ecki.pl>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
 linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/17] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: add EyeQ5 OLB system
 controller

On 26/01/2024 13:28, Théo Lebrun wrote:
>>>
>>> 		pinctrl0: pinctrl-a {
>>> 			compatible = "mobileye,eyeq5-a-pinctrl";
>>> 			reg = <0x0B0 0x30>;
>>> 		};
>>>
>>> 		pinctrl1: pinctrl-b {
>>> 			compatible = "mobileye,eyeq5-b-pinctrl";
>>> 			reg = <0x0B0 0x30>;
>>
>> Duplicate reg?
> 
> Yes, the mapping is intertwined. Else it could be three ressources per
> pinctrl. Just really small ones.
> 
>  - 0xB0 mapping   A
>  - 0xB4 mapping   B
>  - 0xB8
>  - 0xBC
>  - 0xC0 pull-down A
>  - 0xC4 pull-up   A
>  - 0xC8 pull-down B
>  - 0xCC pull-up   B
>  - 0xD0 drive-strength lo A
>  - 0xD4 drive-strength hi A
>  - 0xD8 drive-strength lo B
>  - 0xDC drive-strength hi B
> 
> 0xB8 is unrelated (I2C speed & SPI CS). 0xBC is a hole.

Then maybe Rob's idea of one pinctrl device is better...

Best regards,
Krzysztof