[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5ecacaa-8ccc-4588-b3be-4b5f85813909@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 03:23:12 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, andi.shyti@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
jassi.brar@...sung.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andre.draszik@...aro.org,
peter.griffin@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/17] spi: s3c64xx: use bitfield access macros
Hi, Sam,
Thanks for the review feedback!
On 1/26/24 20:12, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>> - val |= S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_BUS_TSZ_HALFWORD;
>> - val |= S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_CH_TSZ_HALFWORD;
>> + val |= FIELD_PREP(S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_BUS_TSZ_MASK,
>> + S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_BUS_TSZ_HALFWORD) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_CH_TSZ_MASK,
>> + S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_CH_TSZ_HALFWORD);
> Two people complained it makes the code harder to read. Yet it's not
> addressed in v3. Please see my comments for your previous submission
> explaining what can be done, and also Andi's comment on that matter.
I kept these intentionally. Please read my reply on that matter or the
cover letter to this patch set.
> Also I think new patch series are being submitted a bit too fast,
> people might not have enough time to provide the review.
This patch set contains patches that are already reviewed or too simple
to being lagged.
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists