[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240127015629.GA36077@localhost>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 20:56:29 -0500
From: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...il.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rock-pi-e: fix location of
snps properties
On Thu 2024-01-25 @ 09:12:46 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 19. Januar 2024, 00:03:12 CET schrieb Trevor Woerner:
> > On Thu 2024-01-18 @ 08:31:30 AM, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> > > On 2024-01-17 09:15, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> > > I have just sent out a U-Boot series that fix ethernet on the v1.21
> > > revision of the ROCK Pi E board, see [2].
> >
> > Thank you! I have tested your patches both in U-Boot and Linux and they work
> > perfectly.
>
> if I'm reading this correctly, this patch is not needed anymore, right?
True, patch 2/2 is not needed (or correct).
> I'm not yet sure about the first patch, as it really is
> just a cosmetic ;-)
I wouldn't say it's entirely cosmetic. Some rock-pi-e boards come with the
8211e PHY and others come with the 8211f PHY. Labelling the phandle as
"rtl8211e" would be misleading/confusing for people who had boards whose boot
logs would report otherwise.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists