lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKzKK0oEO5_-CBKvYSw4DKY4Wp5UPrrt1ehBFRd79idy7FsUuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 22:00:49 +0800
From: Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@...gle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, quic_prashk@...cinc.com, 
	stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_serial: Add null pointer checks after
 RX/TX submission

Hi Greg & Jiri,

>> Or you switch to tty_port refcounting and need not fiddling with this at all
>> ;).
> I agree, Kuen-Han, why not do that instead?

Thanks for the feedback! I agree that switching to tty_port
refcounting is the right approach.

I'm currently digging into tty_port.c to understand the best way to
implement this change. Could you confirm if I'm on the right track by
using tty_kref_get() and tty_kref_put() to address race conditions?
Additionally, do I need to refactor other functions in u_serial.c that
interact with the TTY without refcounting?

Regards,
Kuen-Han

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ