[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbZqZDvdw-_D3hyb@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 16:53:24 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, lakshmi.sowjanya.d@...el.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] pwm: dwc: Add 16 channel support for Intel
Elkhart Lake
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:32:36AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Intel Elkhart Lake PSE includes two instances of PWM as a single PCI
> function with 8 channels each. Add support for the remaining channels.
..
> +static int dwc_pwm_init(struct device *dev, const struct dwc_pwm_info *info, void __iomem *base)
> +{
> + /* Default values for single instance devices */
> + unsigned int nr = 1, size = 0;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + /* Fill up values from driver_data, if any */
> + if (info) {
> + nr = info->nr;
> + size = info->size;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> + struct dwc_pwm *dwc;
> +
> + dwc = dwc_pwm_alloc(dev);
> + if (!dwc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + dwc->base = base + (i * size);
> +
> + ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, &dwc->chip);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Why not doing this slightly differently?
First option: Always provide driver data (info is never NULL).
Second option, have the body of the for-loop be factored to a helper
dwc_pwm_init_one() and here
if (!info)
return dwc_pwm_init_one(..., 1, 0);
for (i = 0; i < info->nr; i++) {
ret = dwc_pwm_init_one(...);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists