[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <r6vulwv76x7ydkmszlwlswjve7y2pmasz77wkqub73qopd5src@y3ta72owtw5b>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 17:58:38 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, lakshmi.sowjanya.d@...el.com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] pwm: dwc: simplify error handling
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 04:48:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:32:37AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > Simplify error handling in ->probe() function using dev_err_probe() helper.
>
> ...
>
> > ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pci, BIT(0), pci_name(pci));
> > - if (ret) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to iomap PCI BAR (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to iomap PCI BAR (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> >
> > base = pcim_iomap_table(pci)[0];
>
> > - if (!base) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Base address missing\n");
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > - }
> > + if (!base)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "Base address missing\n");
>
> This check is bogus. Just remove it completely.
This would be a separate patch though. IMHO mechanically converting to
dev_err_probe() is fine.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists