linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add JH7100 SoC compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:38:27 +0200
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
 Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add
 JH7100 SoC compatible

On 1/29/24 15:34, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Thank you for the review!
>>
>> Could you please apply it to the RESEND version [1] instead, as this one 
>> had an issue collecting the latest tags, as indicated in [2].
>>
>> Regards,
>> Cristian
> 
> Hi Cristian
> 
> IT is your job as developers to collect together such reviewed-by:
> tags add apply them to the latest version. So long as there are no
> major changes, they are still consider applicable.

Hi Andrew,

Jakub requested a rebase, but I missed a tag and that's why I submitted
the RESEND.  Now we got this new tag which is not on the RESEND
submission, that's why I asked Krzysztof if he could add his R-b on that
one.  Unless the maintainers' tooling is able to fetch tags from both
submissions?!

Thanks,
Cristian