[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <34C3C358-7550-48D6-9421-EAD6C5ED3C35@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:44:12 +0800
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To: Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ligang.bdlg@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] hugetlb: parallelize 2M hugetlb allocation and
initialization
> On Jan 26, 2024, at 23:24, Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> By distributing both the allocation and the initialization tasks across
> multiple threads, the initialization of 2M hugetlb will be faster,
> thereby improving the boot speed.
>
> Here are some test results:
> test case no patch(ms) patched(ms) saved
> ------------------- -------------- ------------- --------
> 256c2T(4 node) 2M 3336 1051 68.52%
> 128c1T(2 node) 2M 1943 716 63.15%
>
> Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>
> Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists