[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240129124511.37c0ad19@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:45:11 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu
Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Christian Brauner
<brauner@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ajay Kaher
<ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [eventfs] 852e46e239:
BUG:unable_to_handle_page_fault_for_address
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:44:36 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:40:06 -0800
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Now, I do agree that your locking is strange, and that should be fixed
> > *too*, but I think the above is the "right" fix for this particular
> > issue.
>
> Would you be OK if I did both as a "fix"?
>
In separate patches of course. And I may even give the same tags to both
patches as well.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists