Message-ID: <CAAa6QmSSKFjzdG62MZ5bSrhP19AjPEr339WXaWY=OCLsGWVE8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:03:40 -0800
From: "Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@...gle.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, 
	david@...hat.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, peterx@...hat.com, 
	minchan@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/khugepaged: bypassing unnecessary scans with
 MMF_DISABLE_THP check

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:53 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 9:46 PM Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > khugepaged scans the entire address space in the
> > background for each given mm, looking for
> > opportunities to merge sequences of basic pages
> > into huge pages. However, when an mm is inserted
> > to the mm_slots list, and the MMF_DISABLE_THP flag
> > is set later, this scanning process becomes
> > unnecessary for that mm and can be skipped to avoid
> > redundant operations, especially in scenarios with
> > a large address space.
> >
> > This commit introduces a check before each scanning
> > process to test the MMF_DISABLE_THP flag for the
> > given mm; if the flag is set, the scanning process
> > is bypassed, thereby improving the efficiency of
> > khugepaged.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/khugepaged.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 2b219acb528e..d6a700834edc 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -410,6 +410,12 @@ static inline int hpage_collapse_test_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >         return atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline int hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > +{
> > +       return hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm) ||
> > +              test_bit(MMF_DISABLE_THP, &mm->flags);
> > +}
> > +
> >  void __khugepaged_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  {
> >         struct khugepaged_mm_slot *mm_slot;
> > @@ -1422,7 +1428,7 @@ static void collect_mm_slot(struct khugepaged_mm_slot *mm_slot)
> >
> >         lockdep_assert_held(&khugepaged_mm_lock);
> >
> > -       if (hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm)) {
> > +       if (hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm)) {
> >                 /* free mm_slot */
> >                 hash_del(&slot->hash);
> >                 list_del(&slot->mm_node);
> > @@ -2360,7 +2366,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
> >                 goto breakouterloop_mmap_lock;
> >
> >         progress++;
> > -       if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm)))
> > +       if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm)))
> >                 goto breakouterloop;
> >
> >         vma_iter_init(&vmi, mm, khugepaged_scan.address);
> > @@ -2368,7 +2374,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
> >                 unsigned long hstart, hend;
> >
> >                 cond_resched();
> > -               if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm))) {
> > +               if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm))) {
>
> The later thp_vma_allowable_order() does check whether MMF_DISABLE_THP
> is set or not. And the hugepage_vma_revalidate() after re-acquiring
> mmap_lock does the same check too. The checking in khugepaged should
> be already serialized with prctl, which takes mmap_lock in write.

IIUC, there really isn't any correctness race. Claim is just that we
can avoid a number of per-vma checks. AFAICT, any task w/
MMF_DISABLE_THP set will always have each and every vma checked
(albeit, with a very inexpensive ->vm_mm->flags check)

Thanks,
Zach

> >                         progress++;
> >                         break;
> >                 }
> > @@ -2390,7 +2396,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
> >                         bool mmap_locked = true;
> >
> >                         cond_resched();
> > -                       if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm)))
> > +                       if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm)))
> >                                 goto breakouterloop;
> >
> >                         VM_BUG_ON(khugepaged_scan.address < hstart ||
> > @@ -2408,7 +2414,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
> >                                 fput(file);
> >                                 if (*result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
> >                                         mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > -                                       if (hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm))
> > +                                       if (hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm))
> >                                                 goto breakouterloop;
> >                                         *result = collapse_pte_mapped_thp(mm,
> >                                                 khugepaged_scan.address, false);
> > @@ -2450,7 +2456,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
> >          * Release the current mm_slot if this mm is about to die, or
> >          * if we scanned all vmas of this mm.
> >          */
> > -       if (hpage_collapse_test_exit(mm) || !vma) {
> > +       if (hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm) || !vma) {
> >                 /*
> >                  * Make sure that if mm_users is reaching zero while
> >                  * khugepaged runs here, khugepaged_exit will find
> > --
> > 2.33.1
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists