[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whb91PWEaEJpRGsuWaQpYZGj98ji8HC2vvHD4xb_TqhJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:24:12 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [eventfs] 852e46e239: BUG:unable_to_handle_page_fault_for_address
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 09:40, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> IOW, I think the right fix is really just this:
Oh, for some reason I sent out the original patch I had which didn't
fix the create_dir() case.
So that patch was missing the important hunk that added the
ti->flags = TRACEFS_EVENT_INODE;
ti->private = ei;
to create_dir() (to match the removal in eventfs_post_create_dir()).
I had incorrectly put it in the create_file() case, that should just
set ->private to NULL. afaik
So the patch was completely broken. Here's the one that should
actually compile (although still not actually *tested*).
Linus
View attachment "0001-eventfsfs-initialize-the-tracefs-inode-properly.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2544 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists