linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Staging: rtl8192e: 18 Additional checkpatch fixes for rtllib

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:36:06 +0100
From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Tree Davies <tdavies@...kphysics.net>, anjan@...i.ca,
 linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Staging: rtl8192e: 18 Additional checkpatch
 fixes for rtllib_softmac.c

On 1/27/24 21:24, Greg KH wrote:
> You might want to respond with:
> 	Tested-by: ....
> so that our tools pick it up and you get added to the commit logs, if
> you want that.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Hi Greg,

thanks for your hint. I am already on Position 6 on the world rank list 
for "Tested-by:..."

No.1	 Daniel Wheeler <daniel ! wheeler () amd ! com> 
2417(3.51%)	@AMD                             @Unknown
No.2	 Andrew Bowers <andrewx ! bowers () intel ! com> 
2386(3.46%)	@Intel                           @Unknown
No.3	 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme () redhat ! com> 
1300(1.89%)	@Red Hat                         @Brazilian
No.4	 Aaron Brown <aaron ! f ! brown () intel ! com> 
1206(1.75%)	@Intel                           @Unknown
No.5	 Phil Schmitt <phillip ! j ! schmitt () intel ! com> 
566(0.82%)	@Intel                           @Unknown
No.6	 Philipp Hortmann <philipp ! g ! hortmann () gmail ! com> 
537(0.78%)	@Hobbyists                       @German

I wonder if I deserve so much recognition. I thought you do not like me 
hunting for so easy credits. But it seems that I was wrong with this 
assumption.

Will use "Tested-by:..." in the future.

Thanks for your support.

Bye Philipp