[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874jevk8j8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:46:20 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org,
perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core.c: Prefer to return dai->driver->name in snd_soc_dai_name_get()
Hi Chancel
Thank you for the patch
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> index 516350533e73..09467c693627 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> @@ -300,12 +300,12 @@ static int snd_soc_is_matching_dai(const struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *dlc,
> const char *snd_soc_dai_name_get(struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> {
> /* see snd_soc_is_matching_dai() */
> - if (dai->name)
> - return dai->name;
> -
> if (dai->driver->name)
> return dai->driver->name;
>
> + if (dai->name)
> + return dai->name;
> +
> if (dai->component->name)
> return dai->component->name;
>
> --
As above comment indicated, snd_soc_dai_name_get() and
snd_soc_is_matching_dai() are paired.
If you want to update snd_soc_dai_name_get(), updating
snd_soc_is_matching_dai() also is good idea.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Renesas Electronics
Ph.D. Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists