| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Zbdcao0emQyBodCK@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:06:02 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: qcom: edp: Add set_mode op for configuring
eDP/DP submode
On 24-01-29 06:05:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 02:26, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Future platforms should not use different compatibles to differentiate
> > between eDP and DP mode. Instead, they should use a single compatible as the
> > IP block is the same. It will be the job of the controller to set the submode
> > of the PHY accordingly.
> >
> > The existing platforms will remain with separate compatibles for each mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > index 8e5078304646..af941d6c5588 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > +#include <linux/phy/phy-dp.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/reset.h>
> > @@ -68,19 +69,21 @@
> >
> > #define TXn_TRAN_DRVR_EMP_EN 0x0078
> >
> > -struct qcom_edp_cfg {
> > - bool is_dp;
> > -
> > - /* DP PHY swing and pre_emphasis tables */
> > +struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg {
> > const u8 (*swing_hbr_rbr)[4][4];
> > const u8 (*swing_hbr3_hbr2)[4][4];
> > const u8 (*pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr)[4][4];
> > const u8 (*pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2)[4][4];
> > };
> >
> > +struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg {
> > + bool is_edp;
> > + const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg *swing_pre_emph_cfg;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct qcom_edp {
> > struct device *dev;
> > - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg;
> > + const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg *cfg;
> >
> > struct phy *phy;
> >
> > @@ -96,6 +99,8 @@ struct qcom_edp {
> >
> > struct clk_bulk_data clks[2];
> > struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> > +
> > + bool is_edp;
> > };
> >
> > static const u8 dp_swing_hbr_rbr[4][4] = {
> > @@ -126,8 +131,7 @@ static const u8 dp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3[4][4] = {
> > { 0x04, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct qcom_edp_cfg dp_phy_cfg = {
> > - .is_dp = true,
> > +static const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg dp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg = {
> > .swing_hbr_rbr = &dp_swing_hbr_rbr,
> > .swing_hbr3_hbr2 = &dp_swing_hbr2_hbr3,
> > .pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr = &dp_pre_emp_hbr_rbr,
> > @@ -162,18 +166,28 @@ static const u8 edp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3[4][4] = {
> > { 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct qcom_edp_cfg edp_phy_cfg = {
> > - .is_dp = false,
> > +static const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg = {
> > .swing_hbr_rbr = &edp_swing_hbr_rbr,
> > .swing_hbr3_hbr2 = &edp_swing_hbr2_hbr3,
> > .pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr = &edp_pre_emp_hbr_rbr,
> > .pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2 = &edp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc7280_dp_phy_cfg = {
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_dp_phy_cfg = {
> > + .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &dp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_edp_phy_cfg = {
> > + .is_edp = true,
> > + .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> > {
> > struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg;
> > int ret;
> > u8 cfg8;
> >
> > @@ -200,7 +214,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> > DP_PHY_PD_CTL_PLL_PWRDN | DP_PHY_PD_CTL_DP_CLAMP_EN,
> > edp->edp + DP_PHY_PD_CTL);
> >
> > - if (cfg && cfg->is_dp)
> > + if (edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg && !edp->is_edp)
>
> I think (!edp->is_edp) should be enough here.
Actually, in case of DP, the cfg8 needs to be 0xb7 for sc8280xp, while for sc7280 it should be 0x37.
So to differentiate between first and second we check if the config
provides a swing_pre_emph_cfg
>
> > cfg8 = 0xb7;
> > else
> > cfg8 = 0x37;
> > @@ -234,7 +248,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> >
> > static int qcom_edp_set_voltages(struct qcom_edp *edp, const struct phy_configure_opts_dp *dp_opts)
> > {
> > - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg;
> > + const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg;
> > unsigned int v_level = 0;
> > unsigned int p_level = 0;
> > u8 ldo_config;
> > @@ -245,6 +259,9 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_voltages(struct qcom_edp *edp, const struct phy_configur
> > if (!cfg)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (edp->is_edp)
> > + cfg = &edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg;
> > +
> > for (i = 0; i < dp_opts->lanes; i++) {
> > v_level = max(v_level, dp_opts->voltage[i]);
> > p_level = max(p_level, dp_opts->pre[i]);
> > @@ -261,7 +278,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_voltages(struct qcom_edp *edp, const struct phy_configur
> > if (swing == 0xff || emph == 0xff)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - ldo_config = (cfg && cfg->is_dp) ? 0x1 : 0x0;
> > + ldo_config = edp->is_edp ? 0x0 : 0x1;
> >
> > writel(ldo_config, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
> > writel(swing, edp->tx0 + TXn_TX_DRV_LVL);
> > @@ -447,10 +464,9 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_vco_div(const struct qcom_edp *edp, unsigned long *pixel
> > static int qcom_edp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> > {
> > const struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg;
> > u32 bias0_en, drvr0_en, bias1_en, drvr1_en;
> > unsigned long pixel_freq;
> > - u8 ldo_config;
> > + u8 ldo_config = 0x0;
> > int timeout;
> > int ret;
> > u32 val;
> > @@ -468,7 +484,8 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> > return timeout;
> >
> >
> > - ldo_config = (cfg && cfg->is_dp) ? 0x1 : 0x0;
> > + if (edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg && !edp->cfg->is_edp)
>
> I'd assume this should be `if (!edp->is_edp)`, see qcom_edp_set_voltages()
>
Yep. will fix.
> > + ldo_config = 0x1;
> >
> > writel(ldo_config, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
> > writel(ldo_config, edp->tx1 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
> > @@ -589,6 +606,18 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int qcom_edp_phy_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode)
> > +{
> > + struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > +
> > + if (mode != PHY_MODE_DP)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + edp->is_edp = submode == PHY_SUBMODE_EDP ? true : false;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int qcom_edp_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
> > {
> > struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > @@ -604,6 +633,7 @@ static const struct phy_ops qcom_edp_ops = {
> > .configure = qcom_edp_phy_configure,
> > .power_on = qcom_edp_phy_power_on,
> > .power_off = qcom_edp_phy_power_off,
> > + .set_mode = qcom_edp_phy_set_mode,
> > .exit = qcom_edp_phy_exit,
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> > @@ -781,6 +811,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > edp->dev = dev;
> > edp->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > + edp->is_edp = edp->cfg->is_edp;
> >
> > edp->edp = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(edp->edp))
> > @@ -839,10 +870,10 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id qcom_edp_phy_match_table[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-edp-phy" },
> > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-edp-phy" },
> > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp-phy", .data = &dp_phy_cfg },
> > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp-phy", .data = &edp_phy_cfg },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-edp-phy" , .data = &sc7280_dp_phy_cfg, },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-edp-phy", .data = &sc7280_dp_phy_cfg, },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp-phy", .data = &sc8280xp_dp_phy_cfg, },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp-phy", .data = &sc8280xp_edp_phy_cfg, },
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_edp_phy_match_table);
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists