linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v19 22/30] drm/shmem-helper: Add common memory shrinker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e062b0dc-6630-42f9-b3ca-ac4bc0597190@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:25:26 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
 Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>, Chia-I Wu
 <olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
 Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
 Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel@...labora.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 22/30] drm/shmem-helper: Add common memory shrinker

On 1/29/24 12:01, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri,  5 Jan 2024 21:46:16 +0300
> Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
> 
>> +/**
>> + * drm_gem_shmem_swapin_locked() - Moves shmem GEM back to memory and enables
>> + *                                 hardware access to the memory.
>> + * @shmem: shmem GEM object
>> + *
>> + * This function moves shmem GEM back to memory if it was previously evicted
>> + * by the memory shrinker. The GEM is ready to use on success.
>> + *
>> + * Returns:
>> + * 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
>> + */
>> +int drm_gem_shmem_swapin_locked(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>> +{
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
>> +
>> +	if (!shmem->evicted)
>> +		return 0;
> 
> Shouldn't we have a drm_gem_shmem_shrinker_update_lru_locked() even if
> the object wasn't evicted, such that idle->busy transition moves the BO
> to the list tail?

Seems so, good catch. I'll double-check and remove it in the next version.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry