Message-ID: <170652544552.398.565528579108985833.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:50:45 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Qiuxu Zhuo" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>, "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,  <stable@...nel.org>,
 x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/lib: Revert to _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() for
 {get,put}_user() fixups

The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     8eed4e00a370b37b4e5985ed983dccedd555ea9d
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/8eed4e00a370b37b4e5985ed983dccedd555ea9d
Author:        Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:38:42 +08:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
CommitterDate: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:40:41 +01:00

x86/lib: Revert to _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() for {get,put}_user() fixups

During memory error injection test on kernels >= v6.4, the kernel panics
like below. However, this issue couldn't be reproduced on kernels <= v6.3.

  mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 296: Machine Check Exception: f Bank 1: bd80000000100134
  mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP 10:<ffffffff821b9776> {__get_user_nocheck_4+0x6/0x20}
  mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 411a93533ed ADDR 346a8730040 MISC 86
  mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:a06d0 TIME 1706000767 SOCKET 1 APIC 211 microcode 80001490
  mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii'
  mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Data load in unrecoverable area of kernel
  Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal local machine check

The MCA code can recover from an in-kernel #MC if the fixup type is
EX_TYPE_UACCESS, explicitly indicating that the kernel is attempting to
access userspace memory. However, if the fixup type is EX_TYPE_DEFAULT
the only thing that is raised for an in-kernel #MC is a panic.

ex_handler_uaccess() would warn if users gave a non-canonical addresses
(with bit 63 clear) to {get, put}_user(), which was unexpected.

Therefore, commit

  b19b74bc99b1 ("x86/mm: Rework address range check in get_user() and put_user()")

replaced _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() with _ASM_EXTABLE() for {get, put}_user()
fixups. However, the new fixup type EX_TYPE_DEFAULT results in a panic.

Commit

  6014bc27561f ("x86-64: make access_ok() independent of LAM")

added the check gp_fault_address_ok() right before the WARN_ONCE() in
ex_handler_uaccess() to not warn about non-canonical user addresses due
to LAM.

With that in place, revert back to _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() for {get,put}_user()
exception fixups in order to be able to handle in-kernel MCEs correctly
again.

  [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Fixes: b19b74bc99b1 ("x86/mm: Rework address range check in get_user() and put_user()")
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240129063842.61584-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com
---
 arch/x86/lib/getuser.S | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/lib/putuser.S | 20 ++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S b/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S
index 20ef350..10d5ed8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S
@@ -163,23 +163,23 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__get_user_8_handle_exception)
 #endif
 
 /* get_user */
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, __get_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(2b, __get_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(3b, __get_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(1b, __get_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(2b, __get_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(3b, __get_user_handle_exception)
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(4b, __get_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(4b, __get_user_handle_exception)
 #else
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(4b, __get_user_8_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(5b, __get_user_8_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(4b, __get_user_8_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(5b, __get_user_8_handle_exception)
 #endif
 
 /* __get_user */
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(6b, __get_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(7b, __get_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(8b, __get_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(6b, __get_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(7b, __get_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(8b, __get_user_handle_exception)
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(9b, __get_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(9b, __get_user_handle_exception)
 #else
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(9b, __get_user_8_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(10b, __get_user_8_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(9b, __get_user_8_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(10b, __get_user_8_handle_exception)
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/putuser.S b/arch/x86/lib/putuser.S
index 2877f59..975c9c1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/putuser.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/putuser.S
@@ -133,15 +133,15 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(__put_user_handle_exception)
 	RET
 SYM_CODE_END(__put_user_handle_exception)
 
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, __put_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(2b, __put_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(3b, __put_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(4b, __put_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(5b, __put_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(6b, __put_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(7b, __put_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(9b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(1b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(2b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(3b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(4b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(5b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(6b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(7b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(9b, __put_user_handle_exception)
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(8b, __put_user_handle_exception)
-	_ASM_EXTABLE(10b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(8b, __put_user_handle_exception)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(10b, __put_user_handle_exception)
 #endif

Powered by blists - more mailing lists