linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tun: AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:40:38 +0000
From: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
CC: "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>, "willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com"
	<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "magnus.karlsson@...el.com"
	<magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@...ts.linux.dev" <virtualization@...ts.linux.dev>, xudingke
	<xudingke@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tun: AF_XDP Rx zero-copy support

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:03 AM
> To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> Cc: mst@...hat.com; willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com; kuba@...nel.org;
> davem@...emloft.net; magnus.karlsson@...el.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org;
> virtualization@...ts.linux.dev; xudingke <xudingke@...wei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tun: AF_XDP Rx zero-copy support
> 
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 8:54 PM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 12:49 PM
> > > To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> > > Cc: mst@...hat.com; willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com;
> > > kuba@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net; magnus.karlsson@...el.com;
> > > netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > kvm@...r.kernel.org; virtualization@...ts.linux.dev; xudingke
> > > <xudingke@...wei.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tun: AF_XDP Rx zero-copy support
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:38 PM Yunjian Wang
> > > <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Now the zero-copy feature of AF_XDP socket is supported by some
> > > > drivers, which can reduce CPU utilization on the xdp program.
> > > > This patch set allows tun to support AF_XDP Rx zero-copy feature.
> > > >
> > > > This patch tries to address this by:
> > > > - Use peek_len to consume a xsk->desc and get xsk->desc length.
> > > > - When the tun support AF_XDP Rx zero-copy, the vq's array maybe empty.
> > > > So add a check for empty vq's array in vhost_net_buf_produce().
> > > > - add XDP_SETUP_XSK_POOL and ndo_xsk_wakeup callback support
> > > > - add tun_put_user_desc function to copy the Rx data to VM
> > >
> > > Code explains themselves, let's explain why you need to do this.
> > >
> > > 1) why you want to use peek_len
> > > 2) for "vq's array", what does it mean?
> > > 3) from the view of TUN/TAP tun_put_user_desc() is the TX path, so I
> > > guess you meant TX zerocopy instead of RX (as I don't see codes for
> > > RX?)
> >
> > OK, I agree and use TX zerocopy instead of RX zerocopy. I meant RX
> > zerocopy from the view of vhost-net.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> >
> > >
> > > A big question is how could you handle GSO packets from
> userspace/guests?
> >
> > Now by disabling VM's TSO and csum feature.
> 
> Btw, how could you do that?

By set network backend-specific options:
<driver name='vhost'>
	<host csum='off' gso='off' tso4='off' tso6='off' ecn='off' ufo='off' mrg_rxbuf='off'/>
    <guest csum='off' tso4='off' tso6='off' ecn='off' ufo='off'/>
</driver>

Thanks

> 
> Thanks
>