[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b9d62e4-be3d-4190-83e7-4058487995af@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:15:43 +0800
From: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Marek BehĂșn
<kabel@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Wong Vee Khee
<veekhee@...le.com>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Revanth Kumar Uppala <ruppala@...dia.com>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@...aro.org>,
Jochen Henneberg <jh@...neberg-systemdesign.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>, Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Voon Wei Feng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>,
Lai Peter Jun Ann <jun.ann.lai@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] net: pcs: xpcs: combine C37 SGMII AN and
2500BASEX for Intel mGbE controller
On 26/9/2023 6:51 pm, Serge Semin wrote:
> Hi Choong
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 08:19:43PM +0800, Choong Yong Liang wrote:
>> From: "Tan, Tee Min" <tee.min.tan@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> This commit introduces xpcs_sgmii_2500basex_features[] that combine
>> xpcs_sgmii_features[] and xpcs_2500basex_features[] for Intel mGbE
>> controller that desire to interchange the speed mode of
>> 10/100/1000/2500Mbps at runtime.
>>
>> Also, we introduce xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii_2500basex() function
>> which is called by the xpcs_do_config() with the new AN mode:
>> DW_SGMII_2500BASEX, and this new function will proceed next-level
>> calling to perform C37 SGMII AN/2500BASEX configuration based on
>> the PHY interface updated by PHY driver.
>
> Why do you even need all of those changes? Please thoroughly justify
> because ... (see below)
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tan, Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
>> index 4dbc21f604f2..60d90191677d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
>> @@ -104,6 +104,21 @@ static const int xpcs_2500basex_features[] = {
>> __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS,
>> };
>>
>
>> +static const int xpcs_sgmii_2500basex_features[] = {
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Pause_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Autoneg_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Half_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Full_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Half_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_2500baseX_Full_BIT,
>> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_2500baseT_Full_BIT,
>> + __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS,
>> +};
>> +
>> static const phy_interface_t xpcs_usxgmii_interfaces[] = {
>> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII,
>> };
>> @@ -133,6 +148,12 @@ static const phy_interface_t xpcs_2500basex_interfaces[] = {
>> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MAX,
>> };
>>
>> +static const phy_interface_t xpcs_sgmii_2500basex_interfaces[] = {
>> + PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII,
>> + PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX,
>> + PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MAX,
>> +};
>> +
>
> ... these are just a combination of the
> xpcs_sgmii_features[]/xpcs_sgmii_interfaces[] and
> xpcs_2500basex_features[]/xpcs_2500basex_interfaces[] data which are
> already supported by the generic DW XPCS code. All of these features
> and interfaces are checked in the xpcs_create() method and then get to
> be combined in the framework of the xpcs_validate() and
> xpcs_get_interfaces() functions. And ...
>
>> enum {
>> DW_XPCS_USXGMII,
>> DW_XPCS_10GKR,
>> @@ -141,6 +162,7 @@ enum {
>> DW_XPCS_SGMII,
>> DW_XPCS_1000BASEX,
>> DW_XPCS_2500BASEX,
>> + DW_XPCS_SGMII_2500BASEX,
>> DW_XPCS_INTERFACE_MAX,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -290,6 +312,7 @@ static int xpcs_soft_reset(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
>> case DW_AN_C37_SGMII:
>> case DW_2500BASEX:
>> case DW_AN_C37_1000BASEX:
>> + case DW_SGMII_2500BASEX:
>> dev = MDIO_MMD_VEND2;
>> break;
>> default:
>> @@ -748,6 +771,8 @@ static int xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
>> if (xpcs->dev_flag == DW_DEV_TXGBE)
>> ret |= DW_VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1_PHY_MODE_CTRL;
>>
>
>> + /* Disable 2.5G GMII for SGMII C37 mode */
>> + ret &= ~DW_VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1_2G5_EN;
>
> * This is the only specific change in this patch. But it can be
> * applied independently from the rest of the changes. Although I agree
> * with Russel, it must be double checked since may cause regressions
> * on the other platforms.
>
>> ret = xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1, ret);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>> @@ -848,6 +873,26 @@ static int xpcs_config_2500basex(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs)
>> return xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_CTRL, ret);
>> }
>>
>
>> +static int xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii_2500basex(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
>> + unsigned int neg_mode,
>> + phy_interface_t interface)
>> +{
>> + int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + switch (interface) {
>> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII:
>> + ret = xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii(xpcs, neg_mode);
>> + break;
>> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX:
>> + ret = xpcs_config_2500basex(xpcs);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>
> ... this is just a copy of the code which is already available in xpcs_do_config():
>
> < compat = xpcs_find_compat(xpcs->id, interface);
> < if (!compat)
> < return -ENODEV;
> <
> < switch (compat->an_mode) {
> < ...
> < case DW_AN_C37_SGMII:
> < ret = xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii(xpcs, neg_mode);
> < if (ret)
> < return ret;
> < break;
> < ...
> < case DW_2500BASEX:
> < ret = xpcs_config_2500basex(xpcs);
> < if (ret)
> < return ret;
> < break;
>
> So based on the passed interface xpcs_find_compat() will find a proper
> compat descriptor, which an_mode field will be then utilized to call
> the respective config method. Thus, unless I miss something, basically
> you won't need any of the changes below and the most of the changes
> above reducing the patch to just a few lines.
>
> -Serge(y)
>
>> int xpcs_do_config(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, phy_interface_t interface,
>> const unsigned long *advertising, unsigned int neg_mode)
>> {
>> @@ -890,6 +935,12 @@ int xpcs_do_config(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, phy_interface_t interface,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> break;
>> + case DW_SGMII_2500BASEX:
>> + ret = xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii_2500basex(xpcs, neg_mode,
>> + interface);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> return -1;
>> }
>> @@ -1114,6 +1165,11 @@ static void xpcs_get_state(struct phylink_pcs *pcs,
>> }
>> break;
>> case DW_AN_C37_SGMII:
>> + case DW_SGMII_2500BASEX:
>> + /* 2500BASEX is not supported for in-band AN mode. */
>> + if (state->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX)
>> + break;
>> +
>> ret = xpcs_get_state_c37_sgmii(xpcs, state);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("xpcs_get_state_c37_sgmii returned %pe\n",
>> @@ -1266,23 +1322,17 @@ static const struct xpcs_compat synopsys_xpcs_compat[DW_XPCS_INTERFACE_MAX] = {
>> .num_interfaces = ARRAY_SIZE(xpcs_10gbaser_interfaces),
>> .an_mode = DW_10GBASER,
>> },
>> - [DW_XPCS_SGMII] = {
>> - .supported = xpcs_sgmii_features,
>> - .interface = xpcs_sgmii_interfaces,
>> - .num_interfaces = ARRAY_SIZE(xpcs_sgmii_interfaces),
>> - .an_mode = DW_AN_C37_SGMII,
>> - },
>> [DW_XPCS_1000BASEX] = {
>> .supported = xpcs_1000basex_features,
>> .interface = xpcs_1000basex_interfaces,
>> .num_interfaces = ARRAY_SIZE(xpcs_1000basex_interfaces),
>> .an_mode = DW_AN_C37_1000BASEX,
>> },
>> - [DW_XPCS_2500BASEX] = {
>> - .supported = xpcs_2500basex_features,
>> - .interface = xpcs_2500basex_interfaces,
>> - .num_interfaces = ARRAY_SIZE(xpcs_2500basex_interfaces),
>> - .an_mode = DW_2500BASEX,
>> + [DW_XPCS_SGMII_2500BASEX] = {
>> + .supported = xpcs_sgmii_2500basex_features,
>> + .interface = xpcs_sgmii_2500basex_interfaces,
>> + .num_interfaces = ARRAY_SIZE(xpcs_sgmii_2500basex_features),
>> + .an_mode = DW_SGMII_2500BASEX,
>> },
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h b/include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h
>> index da3a6c30f6d2..f075d2fca54a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>> #define DW_2500BASEX 3
>> #define DW_AN_C37_1000BASEX 4
>> #define DW_10GBASER 5
>> +#define DW_SGMII_2500BASEX 6
>>
>> /* device vendor OUI */
>> #define DW_OUI_WX 0x0018fc80
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
Hi Serge and Russell
This patch does not serve the purpose correctly, I did remove this patch
and handle it properly in the new patch series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists