[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iX5=u5y0JS2OzYMvYNnjZBCM2YfSTsSdg3CtH4rBMyUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:54:43 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, "open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: video: Handle fetching EDID that is longer than
256 bytes
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 7:55 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>
> The ACPI specification allows for an EDID to be up to 512 bytes but
> the _DDC EDID fetching code will only try up to 256 bytes.
>
> Modify the code to instead start at 512 bytes and work it's way
> down instead.
>
> Link: https://uefi.org/htmlspecs/ACPI_Spec_6_4_html/Apx_B_Video_Extensions/output-device-specific-methods.html#ddc-return-the-edid-for-this-device
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> index 62f4364e4460..b3b15dd4755d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c
> @@ -624,6 +624,10 @@ acpi_video_device_EDID(struct acpi_video_device *device,
> arg0.integer.value = 1;
> else if (length == 256)
> arg0.integer.value = 2;
> + else if (length == 384)
> + arg0.integer.value = 3;
> + else if (length == 512)
> + arg0.integer.value = 4;
It looks like switch () would be somewhat better.
Or maybe even
arg0.integer.value = length / 128;
The validation could be added too:
if (arg0.integer.value > 4 || arg0.integer.value * 128 != length)
return -EINVAL;
but it is pointless, because the caller is never passing an invalid
number to it AFAICS.
> else
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -1443,7 +1447,7 @@ int acpi_video_get_edid(struct acpi_device *device, int type, int device_id,
>
> for (i = 0; i < video->attached_count; i++) {
> video_device = video->attached_array[i].bind_info;
> - length = 256;
> + length = 512;
>
> if (!video_device)
> continue;
> @@ -1478,13 +1482,18 @@ int acpi_video_get_edid(struct acpi_device *device, int type, int device_id,
>
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !buffer ||
> buffer->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> - length = 128;
> - status = acpi_video_device_EDID(video_device, &buffer,
> - length);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !buffer ||
> - buffer->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> - continue;
> + while (length) {
I would prefer a do {} while () loop here, which could include the
first invocation of acpi_video_device_EDID() too (and reduce code
duplication a bit).
> + length -= 128;
> + status = acpi_video_device_EDID(video_device, &buffer,
> + length);
No line break, please.
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !buffer ||
> + buffer->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> + continue;
> + }
> + break;
> }
> + if (!length)
> + continue;
> }
>
> *edid = buffer->buffer.pointer;
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists