[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26ba94b4febb605662913455618896ce4281645c.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:01:40 +0000
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: peter.griffin@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com, tomasz.figa@...il.com,
cw00.choi@...sung.com, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: use correct clocks for
usi8
Hi Sam,
On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 21:22 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> From [1] it looks like DIV_CLK_PERIC0_USI8_USI is a common parrent for
> these two leaf gate clocks:
> 1. GOUT_BLK_PERIC0_UID_RSTNSYNC_CLK_PERIC0_USI8_USI_IPCLKPORT_CLK
> 2. GOUT_BLK_PERIC0_UID_PERIC0_TOP0_IPCLKPORT_IPCLK_7
>
> So IIUC, you replace clock #1 with clock #2 in this patch? If so, I
> think that's a right move, because in my experience RSTNSYNC clocks
That is correct.
Cheers,
Andre'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists