linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the X1E80100 PCIe Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:19:46 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the X1E80100 PCIe
 Controller

On 29/01/2024 12:10, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Document the PCIe Controllers on the X1E80100 platform. They are similar
> to the ones found on SM8550, but they don't have SF QTB clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> ---

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts_getmaintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, use mainline), work on fork of kernel (don't, use
mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really don't). Just use b4 and
all the problems go away.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.

Best regards,
Krzysztof