[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240129143221.263763-3-david@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:32:14 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/9] mm/memory: handle !page case in zap_present_pte() separately
We don't need uptodate accessed/dirty bits, so in theory we could
replace ptep_get_and_clear_full() by an optimized ptep_clear_full()
function. Let's rely on the provided pte.
Further, there is no scenario where we would have to insert uffd-wp
markers when zapping something that is not a normal page (i.e., zeropage).
Add a sanity check to make sure this remains true.
should_zap_folio() no longer has to handle NULL pointers. This change
replaces 2/3 "!page/!folio" checks by a single "!page" one.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 50a6c79c78fc..69502cdc0a7d 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1497,10 +1497,6 @@ static inline bool should_zap_folio(struct zap_details *details,
if (should_zap_cows(details))
return true;
- /* E.g. the caller passes NULL for the case of a zero folio */
- if (!folio)
- return true;
-
/* Otherwise we should only zap non-anon folios */
return !folio_test_anon(folio);
}
@@ -1543,19 +1539,23 @@ static inline void zap_present_pte(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
struct page *page;
page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
- if (page)
- folio = page_folio(page);
+ if (!page) {
+ /* We don't need up-to-date accessed/dirty bits. */
+ ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
+ arch_check_zapped_pte(vma, ptent);
+ tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(userfaultfd_wp(vma));
+ ksm_might_unmap_zero_page(mm, ptent);
+ return;
+ }
+ folio = page_folio(page);
if (unlikely(!should_zap_folio(details, folio)))
return;
ptent = ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
arch_check_zapped_pte(vma, ptent);
tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr);
zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, details, ptent);
- if (unlikely(!page)) {
- ksm_might_unmap_zero_page(mm, ptent);
- return;
- }
if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
if (pte_dirty(ptent)) {
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists