[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWYZ99dm4DmKD25qu2uGXaoxYbqsq0A_K2sz=OB=nXgxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 15:09:29 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:40 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> > > But they don't match, so we can't unify them?
> >
> > I stand corrected...
>
> So, the patch is good as-is?
Yeah...
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Still, it might make sense to apply the same change to the
SIFCTR_RFWM_* definitions. However, that would still leave us with
inconsistencies with other bitfield definitions in the file...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68korg
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists