[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <46b90dbc-3b5f-4f52-8539-0f6fa7e28ce9@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:53:31 -0500
From: "Stefan O'Rear" <sorear@...tmail.com>
To: "Charlie Jenkins" <charlie@...osinc.com>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@...osinc.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>, "Albert Ou" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@...nel.org>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
"Yangyu Chen" <cyy@...self.name>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] riscv: mm: Use hint address in mmap if available
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, at 7:37 PM, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> On riscv it is guaranteed that the address returned by mmap is less than
> the hint address. Allow mmap to return an address all the way up to
> addr, if provided, rather than just up to the lower address space.
>
> This provides a performance benefit as well, allowing mmap to exit after
> checking that the address is in range rather than searching for a valid
> address.
>
> It is possible to provide an address that uses at most the same number
> of bits, however it is significantly more computationally expensive to
> provide that number rather than setting the max to be the hint address.
> There is the instruction clz/clzw in Zbb that returns the highest set bit
> which could be used to performantly implement this, but it would still
> be slower than the current implementation. At worst case, half of the
> address would not be able to be allocated when a hint address is
> provided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 21 ++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> index f19f861cda54..f3ea5166e3b2 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -22,14 +22,11 @@
> ({ \
> unsigned long mmap_end; \
> typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \
> - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \
> - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \
Setting mmap_end in the no-hint case seems to have been lost?
-s
> - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \
> - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \
> - else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \
> - mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \
> + if ((_addr) == 0 || \
> + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task()) || \
> + ((_addr + len) > BIT(VA_BITS - 1))) \
> else \
> - mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39; \
> + mmap_end = (_addr + len); \
> mmap_end; \
> })
>
> @@ -39,14 +36,12 @@
> typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \
> typeof(base) _base = (base); \
> unsigned long rnd_gap = DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW - (_base); \
> - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \
> + if ((_addr) == 0 || \
> + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task()) || \
> + ((_addr + len) > BIT(VA_BITS - 1))) \
> mmap_base = (_base); \
> - else if (((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV57)) \
> - mmap_base = VA_USER_SV57 - rnd_gap; \
> - else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \
> - mmap_base = VA_USER_SV48 - rnd_gap; \
> else \
> - mmap_base = VA_USER_SV39 - rnd_gap; \
> + mmap_base = (_addr + len) - rnd_gap; \
> mmap_base; \
> })
>
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists