[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240129180846.28937389@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:08:46 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John
Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "Michael S.
Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] remove page frag implementation in
vhost_net
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:40:37 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Is this patchset supposed to go through vhost tree instead of net-next?
> As the state is changed to 'Not applicable' in the netdevbpf patchwork,
> according to maintainer-netdev.rst:
>
> Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking
> subsystem
Sorry about the confusion, DaveM changed the way he uses the states
since they were documented. There were concurrent changes to the gve
driver, patches no longer apply. Could you rebase?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists