linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe soc-vvmem subnode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240130-synthetic-passerby-44bab0ad9e1a@spud>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:55:00 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, michal.simek@...inx.com,
	git@...inx.com, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	kishore Manne <nava.kishore.manne@....com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/ZYNQ ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe soc-vvmem subnode

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:13:09AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/29/24 17:57, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 01:25:06PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> > > Describe soc-nvmem subnode as the part of firmware node. The name can't be
> > > pure nvmem because dt-schema already defines it as array property that's
> > > why different name should be used.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Dt binding for nvmem node has been already merged and it is the part of
> > > linux-next tree.
> > > Here is the reference to it just in case:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/170635581622.41421.8980881999042944764.b4-ty@linaro.org
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >   .../bindings/firmware/xilinx/xlnx,zynqmp-firmware.yaml   | 9 +++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/xilinx/xlnx,zynqmp-firmware.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/xilinx/xlnx,zynqmp-firmware.yaml
> > > index 7586fbff7ad6..108772ef574f 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/xilinx/xlnx,zynqmp-firmware.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/xilinx/xlnx,zynqmp-firmware.yaml
> > > @@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ properties:
> > >         interface.
> > >       type: object
> > > +  soc-nvmem:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml#
> > > +    description: The ZynqMP MPSoC provides access to the hardware related data
> > > +      like SOC revision, IDCODE and specific purpose efuses.
> > > +    type: object
> > > +
> > >     pcap:
> > >       $ref: /schemas/fpga/xlnx,zynqmp-pcap-fpga.yaml
> > >       description: The ZynqMP SoC uses the PCAP (Processor Configuration Port) to
> > > @@ -110,6 +116,9 @@ examples:
> > >       firmware {
> > >         zynqmp_firmware: zynqmp-firmware {
> > >           #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > > +        soc-nvmem {
> > > +          compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem-fw";
> > > +        };
> > 
> > Would it not be better to have an actual nvmem-layout in here? The
> > ~empty node here looks rather odd.
> 
> No issue. Do you want full or just nvmem-layout with compatible string (which is
> required)?


What you have below here seems like a much more useful example. I'd go
with that.

Cheers,
Conor.

>        soc-nvmem {
>            compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem-fw";
>            nvmem-layout {
>                compatible = "fixed-layout";
>                #address-cells = <1>;
>                #size-cells = <1>;
> 
>                soc_revision: soc-revision@0 {
>                    reg = <0x0 0x4>;
>                };
>            };
>        };


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)