linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Convert Microchip's HLCDC Text based DT bindings to JSON schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:57:18 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Dharma.B@...rochip.com
Cc: sam@...nborg.org, bbrezillon@...nel.org,
	maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
	tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
	alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lee@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Convert Microchip's HLCDC Text based DT bindings
 to JSON schema

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:42:04AM +0000, Dharma.B@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> 
> On 24/01/24 10:10 pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 03:30:16PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> >> Converted the text bindings to YAML and validated them individually using following commands
> >>
> >> $ make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> >> $ make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> >>
> >> changelogs are available in respective patches.
> >>
> >> As Sam suggested I'm sending the PWM binding as it is in this patch series, clean up patch
> >> will be sent as separate patch.
> > Please give discussion on the previous version some time to complete
> > before sending a new one. I've still got questions about the clocks
> > there.
> 
> Could you please give a green signal to proceed with the v5 patch series 
> with the following changes only in PATCH 3/3?

Didn't we just decide on what to do on the v3 thread yesterday?
Go with that.

> +  clocks:
> +    minItems: 3
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: periph_clk
> +      - const: sys_clk
> +      - const: slow_clk
> +      - const: lvds_pll_clk
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Dharma B.
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)