linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/random: Issue a warning if RDRAND or RDSEED fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <81359B1E-5293-4919-B319-59483C1EA12E@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:15:35 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
CC: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@....com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/random: Issue a warning if RDRAND or RDSEED fails

On January 30, 2024 9:58:09 AM PST, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>On 1/30/24 09:49, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>> Anybody disagree?
>> Yes, I disagree. I made a trivial test that shows RDSEED breaks easily
>> in a busy loop. So at the very least, your statement holds true only
>> for RDRAND.
>
>Well, darn. :)
>
>Any chance you could share some more information about the environment
>where you're seeing this?  It'd be good to reconcile what you're seeing
>with how the hardware is expected to behave.

What CPU is this and could you clarify exactly how you run your busy loop?