linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Clarify comments about the initial phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <170657812687.784857.581913209178930350.b4-ty@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:26:57 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, echanude@...hat.com,
        Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Clarify comments about the initial phy_gear

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:13:36 -0600, Andrew Halaney wrote:

> The comments that currently are within the hw_ver < 4 conditional
> are misleading. They really apply to various branches of the
> conditionals there and incorrectly state that the phy_gear value
> can increase.
> 
> Right now the logic is to:
> 
> [...]

Applied to 6.9/scsi-queue, thanks!

[1/1] scsi: ufs: qcom: Clarify comments about the initial phy_gear
      https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/883a8b451cf4

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering