lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240131095231.292911c3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:52:31 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Randy Dunlap
 <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Udipto Goswami <quic_ugoswami@...cinc.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the usb.current
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the jc_docs tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/usb/gadget-testing.rst

between commit:

  20d03ae36ec0 ("usb: gadget: ncm: Fix indentations in documentation of NCM section")

from the usb.current tree and commit:

  e49bf650ab5b ("usb: gadget: fix max_segment_size malformed table")

from the jc_docs tree.

I fixed it up (these commits fix the same problem, I used the former) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ