linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/20] mm: zswap: rename zswap_free_entry to zswap_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0e7c202d-3a53-4b07-b316-259d6fedc592@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:21:43 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
 Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] mm: zswap: rename zswap_free_entry to
 zswap_entry_free

On 2024/1/30 11:19, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:13:16AM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> On 2024/1/30 09:36, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> There is a zswap_entry_ namespace with multiple functions already.
>>
>> Another is zswap_invalidate_entry(), maybe zswap_entry_invalidate is better.
> 
> You're right.
> 
> I originally had a patch for that, but then dropped it because it is
> sort of also a tree operation and it looked a bit weird to me.

Right.

> 
> But I could be persuaded to include it again, no strong preferences
> either way.

Never mind.