| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240130074744.45759-2-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 15:47:43 +0800
From: Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: dianders@...omium.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
pmladek@...e.com,
lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com,
kernelfans@...il.com,
liusong@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/2] watchdog/softlockup: low-overhead detection of interrupt storm
The following softlockup is caused by interrupt storm, but it cannot be
identified from the call tree. Because the call tree is just a snapshot
and doesn't fully capture the behavior of the CPU during the soft lockup.
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#28 stuck for 23s! [fio:83921]
...
Call trace:
__do_softirq+0xa0/0x37c
__irq_exit_rcu+0x108/0x140
irq_exit+0x14/0x20
__handle_domain_irq+0x84/0xe0
gic_handle_irq+0x80/0x108
el0_irq_naked+0x50/0x58
Therefore，I think it is necessary to report CPU utilization during the
softlockup_thresh period (report once every sample_period, for a total
of 5 reportings), like this:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#28 stuck for 23s! [fio:83921]
CPU#28 Utilization every 4s during lockup:
#1: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle
#2: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle
#3: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle
#4: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle
#5: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle
...
This would be helpful in determining whether an interrupt storm has
occurred or in identifying the cause of the softlockup. The criteria for
determination are as follows:
a. If the hardirq utilization is high, then interrupt storm should be
considered and the root cause cannot be determined from the call tree.
b. If the softirq utilization is high, then we could analyze the call
tree but it may cannot reflect the root cause.
c. If the system utilization is high, then we could analyze the root
cause from the call tree.
Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 81a8862295d6..0efe9604c3c2 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
+#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <asm/irq_regs.h>
#include <linux/kvm_para.h>
@@ -441,6 +443,73 @@ static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts,
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
+#define NUM_STATS_GROUPS 5
+#define STATS_SYSTEM 0
+#define STATS_SOFTIRQ 1
+#define STATS_HARDIRQ 2
+#define STATS_IDLE 3
+#define NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP 4
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u16, cpustat_old[NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP]);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, cpustat_utilization[NUM_STATS_GROUPS][NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP]);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, cpustat_tail);
+static enum cpu_usage_stat idx_to_stat[NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP] = {
+ CPUTIME_SYSTEM, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ, CPUTIME_IRQ, CPUTIME_IDLE
+};
+
+static void update_cpustat(void)
+{
+ u8 i;
+ u16 *old = this_cpu_ptr(cpustat_old);
+ u8 (*utilization)[NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP] = this_cpu_ptr(cpustat_utilization);
+ u8 tail = this_cpu_read(cpustat_tail);
+ struct kernel_cpustat kcpustat;
+ u64 *cpustat = kcpustat.cpustat;
+ u16 sample_period_ms = sample_period >> 24LL; /* 2^24ns ~= 16.8ms */
+
+ kcpustat_cpu_fetch(&kcpustat, smp_processor_id());
+ for (i = STATS_SYSTEM; i < NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP; i++) {
+ /*
+ * We don't need nanosecond resolution. A granularity of 16ms is
+ * sufficient for our precision, allowing us to use u16 to store
+ * cpustats, which will roll over roughly every ~1000 seconds.
+ * 2^24 ~= 16 * 10^6
+ */
+ cpustat[idx_to_stat[i]] = lower_16_bits(cpustat[idx_to_stat[i]] >> 24LL);
+ utilization[tail][i] = 100 * (u16)(cpustat[idx_to_stat[i]] - old[i])
+ / sample_period_ms;
+ old[i] = cpustat[idx_to_stat[i]];
+ }
+ this_cpu_write(cpustat_tail, (tail + 1) % NUM_STATS_GROUPS);
+}
+
+static void print_cpustat(void)
+{
+ u8 i, j;
+ u8 (*utilization)[NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP] = this_cpu_ptr(cpustat_utilization);
+ u8 tail = this_cpu_read(cpustat_tail);
+ u64 sample_period_second = sample_period;
+
+ do_div(sample_period_second, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ /*
+ * We do not want the "watchdog: " prefix on every line,
+ * hence we use "printk" instead of "pr_crit".
+ */
+ printk(KERN_CRIT "CPU#%d Utilization every %llus during lockup:\n",
+ smp_processor_id(), sample_period_second);
+ for (j = STATS_SYSTEM, i = tail; j < NUM_STATS_GROUPS;
+ j++, i = (i + 1) % NUM_STATS_GROUPS) {
+ printk(KERN_CRIT "\t#%d: %3u%% system,\t%3u%% softirq,\t"
+ "%3u%% hardirq,\t%3u%% idle\n", j+1,
+ utilization[i][STATS_SYSTEM], utilization[i][STATS_SOFTIRQ],
+ utilization[i][STATS_HARDIRQ], utilization[i][STATS_IDLE]);
+ }
+}
+#else
+static inline void update_cpustat(void) { }
+static inline void print_cpustat(void) { }
+#endif
+
/* watchdog detector functions */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct completion, softlockup_completion);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, softlockup_stop_work);
@@ -504,6 +573,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
*/
period_ts = READ_ONCE(*this_cpu_ptr(&watchdog_report_ts));
+ update_cpustat();
+
/* Reset the interval when touched by known problematic code. */
if (period_ts == SOFTLOCKUP_DELAY_REPORT) {
if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(softlockup_touch_sync))) {
@@ -539,6 +610,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
pr_emerg("BUG: soft lockup - CPU#%d stuck for %us! [%s:%d]\n",
smp_processor_id(), duration,
current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
+ print_cpustat();
print_modules();
print_irqtrace_events(current);
if (regs)
--
2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists