[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240130010046.2730139-2-leobras@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 22:00:46 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Junyao Zhao <junzhao@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] wq: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work
When __queue_delayed_work() is called, it chooses a cpu for handling the
timer interrupt. As of today, it will pick either the cpu passed as
parameter or the last cpu used for this.
This is not good if a system does use CPU isolation, because it can take
away some valuable cpu time to:
1 - deal with the timer interrupt,
2 - schedule-out the desired task,
3 - queue work on a random workqueue, and
4 - schedule the desired task back to the cpu.
So to fix this, during __queue_delayed_work(), if cpu isolation is in
place, pick a random non-isolated cpu to handle the timer interrupt.
As an optimization, if the current cpu is not isolated, use it instead
of looking for another candidate.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Make sure the CPU is isolated for any value of "cpu"
Changes since RFC:
- Do not use the same cpu from the timer for queueing the work.
- If the current cpu is not isolated, use it's timer instead of
looking for another candidate.
kernel/workqueue.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 76e60faed8923..8dd7c01b326a4 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1958,10 +1958,18 @@ static void __queue_delayed_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
dwork->cpu = cpu;
timer->expires = jiffies + delay;
- if (unlikely(cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND))
+ if (housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_TIMER)) {
+ /* If the current cpu is a housekeeping cpu, use it. */
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ if (!housekeeping_test_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TIMER))
+ cpu = housekeeping_any_cpu(HK_TYPE_TIMER);
add_timer_on(timer, cpu);
- else
- add_timer(timer);
+ } else {
+ if (likely(cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND))
+ add_timer(timer);
+ else
+ add_timer_on(timer, cpu);
+ }
}
/**
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists