linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: unregister device if device_add_disk() failed in sd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d75f4dc-554c-b0ae-3e92-d2cf033dc555@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:30:27 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: linan666@...weicloud.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linan122@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com, houtao1@...wei.com,
 yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: unregister device if device_add_disk() failed
 in sd_probe()

Hi,

在 2024/01/30 1:46, Luis Chamberlain 写道:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 04:27:16PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2023/12/22 14:49, Luis Chamberlain 写道:
>>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 04:23:35PM +0800, linan666@...weicloud.com wrote:
>>>> From: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
>>>>
>>>> "if device_add() succeeds, you should call device_del() when you want to
>>>> get rid of it."
>>>>
>>>> In sd_probe(), device_add_disk() fails when device_add() has already
>>>> succeeded, so change put_device() to device_unregister() to ensure device
>>>> resources are released.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 2a7a891f4c40 ("scsi: sd: Add error handling support for add_disk()")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> Nacked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 +-
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>>>> index 542a4bbb21bc..d81cbeee06eb 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>>>> @@ -3736,7 +3736,7 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev)
>>>>    	error = device_add_disk(dev, gd, NULL);
>>>>    	if (error) {
>>>> -		put_device(&sdkp->disk_dev);
>>>> +		device_unregister(&sdkp->disk_dev);
>>>>    		put_disk(gd);
>>>>    		goto out;
>>>>    	}
>>>
>>> This is incorrect, device_unregister() calls:
>>>
>>> void device_unregister(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> 	pr_debug("device: '%s': %s\n", dev_name(dev), __func__);
>>> 	device_del(dev);
>>> 	put_device(dev);
>>> }
>>>
>>> So you're adding what you believe to be a correct missing device_del().
>>> But what you missed is that if device_add_disk() fails then device_add()
>>> did not succeed because the new code we have in the kernel *today* unwinds
>>> this for us now.
>>
>> I'm confused here, there are two device here, one is 'sdkp->disk_dev',
>> one is gendisk->part0->bd_device, and the order in which they
>> initialize:
>>
>> sd_probe
>> device_add(&sdkp->disk_dev) -> succeed
>> device_add_disk -> failed, and device_add(bd_device) did not succeed
>> put_device(&sdkp->disk_dev) -> device_del is missed
>>
>> I don't see that if device_add_disk() fail, device_del() for
>> 'sdkp->disk_dev'is called from anywhere. Do I missing anything?
> 
> Ah then the fix is still incorrect and the commit log should
> describe that this is for another device.
> 
> How about this instead?
> 
>>>From c3f6e03f4a82aa253b6c487a293dcd576393b606 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:25:18 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] sd: remove extra put_device() for extra scsi device
> 
> The sd driver first device_add() its own device, and later use
> device_add_disk() with another device. When we added error handling
> for device_add_disk() we now call put_disk() and that will trigger
> disk_release() when the refcount is 0. That will end up calling
> the block driver's disk->fops->free_disk() if one is defined. The

This is incorrect. GD_ADDED will only set when device_add_disk()
succeed, and free_disk() will only be called from disk_release() if
GD_ADDED is set. I think Li Nan's patch is correct.

> sd driver has scsi_disk_free_disk() as its free_disk() and that
> does the proper put_device(&sdkp->disk_dev) for us so we should not
> need to call it, however we are left still missing the device_del()
> for it.
> 
> While at it, unwind with scsi_autopm_put_device(sdp) *prior* to
> putting to device as we do in sd_remove().
> 
> Reported-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
> Reported-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
> Fixes: 2a7a891f4c40 ("scsi: sd: Add error handling support for add_disk()")
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/sd.c | 8 +++++---
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 7f949adbadfd..6475a3c947f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -3693,8 +3693,9 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev)
>   
>   	error = device_add(&sdkp->disk_dev);
>   	if (error) {
> +		scsi_autopm_put_device(sdp);
>   		put_device(&sdkp->disk_dev);
> -		goto out;
> +		return error;

I don't see why this is necessary, the tag 'out' is still there. If
you think is a problem, I think you need a separate patch to call
scsi_autopm_put_device() before putting the device.

Thanks,
Kuai

>   	}
>   
>   	dev_set_drvdata(dev, sdkp);
> @@ -3734,9 +3735,10 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev)
>   
>   	error = device_add_disk(dev, gd, NULL);
>   	if (error) {
> -		put_device(&sdkp->disk_dev);
> +		scsi_autopm_put_device(sdp);
> +		device_del(&sdkp->disk_dev);
>   		put_disk(gd);
> -		goto out;
> +		return error;
>   	}
>   
>   	if (sdkp->security) {
>