linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] clk: samsung: gs101: don't mark non-essential clocks as critical

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:31:22 +0000
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: peter.griffin@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, 
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 tudor.ambarus@...aro.org,  willmcvicker@...gle.com,
 alim.akhtar@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,  tomasz.figa@...il.com,
 cw00.choi@...sung.com, mturquette@...libre.com,  sboyd@...nel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,  linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,  devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] clk: samsung: gs101: don't mark non-essential
 clocks as critical

On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 13:16 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> That sounds reasonable. But I wonder if that bit (about making this
> clock CLK_IS_CRITICAL to make earlycon functional) can be documented
> somewhere. Perhaps in the serial driver (earlycon function), or
> somewhere in device tree bindings? Because otherwise it might remain
> an arcane knowledge and people won't be able to use earlycon later.
> Anyways, for this patch:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> 
> and if you think it makes sense to document the bit above, please do.

Will do on top of
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240119104526.1221243-6-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org/
once that is in.

Cheers,
Andre'