[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240130095508.zgufudflizrpxqhy@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 15:25:08 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
vireshk@...nel.org, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
quic_skananth@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add opp table support
to PCIe
On 30-01-24, 15:18, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> So you are saying that the ICC core itself should get the bw values from DT
> instead of hardcoding in the driver? If so, I'd like to get the opinion from
> Georgi/Bjorn.
Not really. The drivers or the ICC core doesn't need to do anything I
guess. Since the values are coming via the OPP, we must just use it to
hide all these details.
Why is the ICC core required to get into this here ? ICC core should
be ready to get the information from DT (may or may not via the OPP
core), or from driver.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists