| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:13:32 +0800
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com,
yu.c.chen@...el.com, Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw@...group.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [sched/eevdf] 2227a957e1:
BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address
On 1/30/24 3:24 PM, kernel test robot Wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> (besides a previous performance report),
> kernel test robot noticed "BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address" on:
>
> commit: 2227a957e1d5b1941be4e4207879ec74f4bb37f8 ("sched/eevdf: Sort the rbtree by virtual deadline")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> [test failed on linus/master 3a5879d495b226d0404098e3564462d5f1daa33b]
> [test failed on linux-next/master 01af33cc9894b4489fb68fa35c40e9fe85df63dc]
>
> in testcase: trinity
> version: trinity-i386-abe9de86-1_20230429
> with following parameters:
>
> runtime: 300s
> group: group-03
> nr_groups: 5
>
> test-description: Trinity is a linux system call fuzz tester.
> test-url: http://codemonkey.org.uk/projects/trinity/
>
>
> compiler: clang-17
> test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G
>
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>
>
>
> we found this issue happens in very random way (23 out of 999 runs).
> but keeps clean on parent.
Thanks for reporting, I will try to reproduce the issue. Does the 'parent'
mean the same code branch without this commit?
>
> 84db47ca7146d7bd 2227a957e1d5b1941be4e420787
> ---------------- ---------------------------
> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> | | |
> :999 2% 23:999 dmesg.BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address
> :999 2% 23:999 dmesg.Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Fatal_exception
> :999 2% 23:999 dmesg.Oops:#[##]
>
>
>
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401301012.2ed95df0-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
> sorry for below parse failure which caused no real line numbers.
> we will follow further. the orgial dmesg could be fetch from below link.
>
>
> [ 512.079810][ T8305] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000002c
> [ 512.080897][ T8305] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 512.081636][ T8305] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 512.082337][ T8305] *pde = 00000000
> [ 512.082829][ T8305] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 512.083407][ T8305] CPU: 1 PID: 8305 Comm: watchdog Tainted: G W N 6.7.0-rc1-00006-g2227a957e1d5 #1 819e6d1a8b887f5f97adb4aed77d98b15504c836
> [ 512.084986][ T8305] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> [ 512.086203][ T8305] EIP: set_next_entity (fair.c:?)
There was actually a NULL-test in pick_eevdf() before this commit,
but I removed it by intent as I found it impossible to be NULL after
examining 'all' the cases.
Also cc Tiwei who once proposed to add this check back.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231208112100.18141-1-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com/
Thanks,
Abel
> [ 512.086881][ T8305] Code: 89 d6 89 cf 85 d2 74 22 39 77 58 75 1d 89 f0 90 90 90 90 90 8b 48 70 39 41 58 75 0e c7 41 58 00 00 00 00 8b 40 6c 85 c0 75 ea <83> 7e 2c 00 74 28 3e 8d 74 26 00 89 f9 89 f2 e8 36 59 00 00 89 f9
> All code
> ========
> 0: 89 d6 mov %edx,%esi
> 2: 89 cf mov %ecx,%edi
> 4: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx
> 6: 74 22 je 0x2a
> 8: 39 77 58 cmp %esi,0x58(%rdi)
> b: 75 1d jne 0x2a
> d: 89 f0 mov %esi,%eax
> f: 90 nop
> 10: 90 nop
> 11: 90 nop
> 12: 90 nop
> 13: 90 nop
> 14: 8b 48 70 mov 0x70(%rax),%ecx
> 17: 39 41 58 cmp %eax,0x58(%rcx)
> 1a: 75 0e jne 0x2a
> 1c: c7 41 58 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,0x58(%rcx)
> 23: 8b 40 6c mov 0x6c(%rax),%eax
> 26: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> 28: 75 ea jne 0x14
> 2a:* 83 7e 2c 00 cmpl $0x0,0x2c(%rsi) <-- trapping instruction
> 2e: 74 28 je 0x58
> 30: 3e 8d 74 26 00 lea %ds:0x0(%rsi,%riz,1),%esi
> 35: 89 f9 mov %edi,%ecx
> 37: 89 f2 mov %esi,%edx
> 39: e8 36 59 00 00 callq 0x5974
> 3e: 89 f9 mov %edi,%ecx
>
> Code starting with the faulting instruction
> ===========================================
> 0: 83 7e 2c 00 cmpl $0x0,0x2c(%rsi)
> 4: 74 28 je 0x2e
> 6: 3e 8d 74 26 00 lea %ds:0x0(%rsi,%riz,1),%esi
> b: 89 f9 mov %edi,%ecx
> d: 89 f2 mov %esi,%edx
> f: e8 36 59 00 00 callq 0x594a
> 14: 89 f9 mov %edi,%ecx
> [ 512.089261][ T8305] EAX: 00000000 EBX: e75ff100 ECX: e75ff100 EDX: 00000000
> [ 512.090180][ T8305] ESI: 00000000 EDI: e75ff100 EBP: ed229dd0 ESP: ed229dc0
> [ 512.091097][ T8305] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [ 512.092138][ T8305] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 0000002c CR3: 0a508000 CR4: 000406d0
> [ 512.093076][ T8305] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
> [ 512.094004][ T8305] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
> [ 512.094643][ T8305] Call Trace:
> [ 512.095145][ T8305] ? __die_body (dumpstack.c:?)
> [ 512.095755][ T8305] ? __die (??:?)
> [ 512.096309][ T8305] ? page_fault_oops (fault.c:?)
> [ 512.096994][ T8305] ? __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
> [ 512.097677][ T8305] ? kmemleak_alloc (??:?)
> [ 512.098343][ T8305] ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops (fault.c:?)
> [ 512.099085][ T8305] ? __bad_area_nosemaphore (fault.c:?)
> [ 512.099839][ T8305] ? bad_area_nosemaphore (fault.c:?)
> [ 512.100579][ T8305] ? do_user_addr_fault (fault.c:?)
> [ 512.101325][ T8305] ? exc_page_fault (??:?)
> [ 512.101992][ T8305] ? pvclock_clocksource_read_nowd (??:?)
> [ 512.102799][ T8305] ? handle_exception (init_task.c:?)
> [ 512.103492][ T8305] ? yield_to_task_fair (fair.c:?)
> [ 512.104166][ T8305] ? pvclock_clocksource_read_nowd (??:?)
> [ 512.104975][ T8305] ? set_next_entity (fair.c:?)
> [ 512.105655][ T8305] ? pvclock_clocksource_read_nowd (??:?)
> [ 512.106447][ T8305] ? set_next_entity (fair.c:?)
> [ 512.107106][ T8305] pick_next_task_fair (??:?)
> [ 512.107788][ T8305] ? put_prev_task_rt (build_policy.c:?)
> [ 512.108460][ T8305] __pick_next_task_fair (fair.c:?)
> [ 512.109162][ T8305] __schedule (core.c:?)
> [ 512.109753][ T8305] schedule (??:?)
> [ 512.110284][ T8305] do_nanosleep (hrtimer.c:?)
> [ 512.110900][ T8305] hrtimer_nanosleep (??:?)
> [ 512.111581][ T8305] ? __remove_hrtimer (hrtimer.c:?)
> [ 512.112264][ T8305] common_nsleep (posix-timers.c:?)
> [ 512.112891][ T8305] __ia32_sys_clock_nanosleep (??:?)
> [ 512.113657][ T8305] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work (??:?)
> [ 512.114486][ T8305] __do_fast_syscall_32 (common.c:?)
> [ 512.115180][ T8305] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode (??:?)
> [ 512.115936][ T8305] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode (??:?)
> [ 512.116690][ T8305] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
> [ 512.117386][ T8305] do_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
> [ 512.118022][ T8305] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
> [ 512.118645][ T8305] EIP: 0xb7edf539
> [ 512.119172][ T8305] Code: 03 74 b4 01 10 07 03 74 b0 01 10 08 03 74 d8 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 0f 1f 00 58 b8 77 00 00 00 cd 80 90 0f 1f
> All code
> ========
> 0: 03 74 b4 01 add 0x1(%rsp,%rsi,4),%esi
> 4: 10 07 adc %al,(%rdi)
> 6: 03 74 b0 01 add 0x1(%rax,%rsi,4),%esi
> a: 10 08 adc %cl,(%rax)
> c: 03 74 d8 01 add 0x1(%rax,%rbx,8),%esi
> ...
> 20: 00 51 52 add %dl,0x52(%rcx)
> 23: 55 push %rbp
> 24:* 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp <-- trapping instruction
> 26: 0f 34 sysenter
> 28: cd 80 int $0x80
> 2a: 5d pop %rbp
> 2b: 5a pop %rdx
> 2c: 59 pop %rcx
> 2d: c3 retq
> 2e: 90 nop
> 2f: 90 nop
> 30: 90 nop
> 31: 90 nop
> 32: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax)
> 35: 58 pop %rax
> 36: b8 77 00 00 00 mov $0x77,%eax
> 3b: cd 80 int $0x80
> 3d: 90 nop
> 3e: 0f .byte 0xf
> 3f: 1f (bad)
>
> Code starting with the faulting instruction
> ===========================================
> 0: 5d pop %rbp
> 1: 5a pop %rdx
> 2: 59 pop %rcx
> 3: c3 retq
> 4: 90 nop
> 5: 90 nop
> 6: 90 nop
> 7: 90 nop
> 8: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax)
> b: 58 pop %rax
> c: b8 77 00 00 00 mov $0x77,%eax
> 11: cd 80 int $0x80
> 13: 90 nop
> 14: 0f .byte 0xf
> 15: 1f (bad)
>
>
> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240130/202401301012.2ed95df0-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists