[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240131-knifflig-bestrafen-d7e53ebfc291@brauner>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:58:53 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] pidfd: implement PIDFD_THREAD flag for
pidfd_open()
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:25:41PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Please see the interdiff below.
>
> Also, I updated the changelog to document that the behaviour of
> pidfd_poll(PIDFD_THREAD, pid-of-group-leader) is not well defined
> if a sub-thread execs.
>
> Do you agree with this semantics?
Yeah, that seems fine to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists