linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: rename vcc5v0_usb30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2179538.KUTt5R2Mg1@diego>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:24:16 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: rename vcc5v0_usb30_host regulator for
 Cool Pi CM5 EVB

Am Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2024, 13:21:56 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> 
> Hi Heiko：
> 
> 在 2024-01-27 21:09:46，"Dragan Simic" <dsimic@...jaro.org> 写道：
> >On 2024-01-27 13:15, Andy Yan wrote:
> >> At 2024-01-27 18:36:40, "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> >>> Am Samstag, 27. Januar 2024, 10:20:33 CET schrieb Andy Yan:
> >>>> According to the schematic, this regulator is used both for USB30 and
> >>>> USB20, so give it a more appropriate name.
> >>> 
> >>> I don't have the schematics, so I'll need you to answer this, but what
> >>> is the regulator called _in_ the schematics?
> >> 
> >> There are two regulators called VCC50_USB_HOST1 and VCC50_USB_HOST2,
> >> and they are both controlled by GPIO1_D5
> >> They both for two usb 2.0 hosts,  not usb 30, the schematics make
> >> me a bit confused.
> >
> >In that case, I'd say that renaming the regulator to vcc5v0_usb_host is
> >fine, but there should also be a comment in the board dts file that it's
> >actually two separate regulators.
> 
> How do you feel about this ？ Or some other style like：
> vcc5v0_usb_host1: vcc5v0_usb_host2：vcc5v0-usb-host-regulator {

I think we're using such a scheme in some places already, and
yes I really like going this way. So that the phandles follow the
schematic names and we can still grep for things.


Heiko