linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/alternatives: Do NOPs optimization on a temporary buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240131162521.GGZbp0cW8aWuYikuAR@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:25:21 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/alternatives: Do NOPs optimization on a
 temporary buffer

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:17:27AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> So as a "next best" effort, I let this rc1-alt-v2 branch run overnight,
> and after over 2200 iterations, I didn't get any boot fails.

Thanks a lot!

As mentioned on IRC yesterday, the important thing is that this doesn't
break any of your guests. And that is good enough.

Much appreciated, thanks again!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette