linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC v4 12/15] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1rVDnK-0027ZN-40@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:50:38 +0000
From: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
To: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	 loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
	 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	 kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
	 x86@...nel.org,
	 acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	 linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	 linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	 linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
	 Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
	 jianyong.wu@....com,
	 justin.he@....com,
	 James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 12/15] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs

From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>

When a CPU is marked as disabled, but online capable in the MADT, PSCI
applies some firmware policy to control when it can be brought online.
PSCI returns DENIED to a CPU_ON request if this is not currently
permitted. The OS can learn the current policy from the _STA enabled bit.

Handle the PSCI DENIED return code gracefully instead of printing an
error.

See https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0022/f/?lang=en page 58.

Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
[ morse: Rewrote commit message ]
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@...amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@....com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
---
Changes since RFC v2
 * Add specification reference
 * Use EPERM rather than EPROBE_DEFER
Changes since RFC v3:
 * Use EPERM everywhere
 * Drop unnecessary changes to drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c  | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
index 29a8e444db83..fabd732d0a2d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	phys_addr_t pa_secondary_entry = __pa_symbol(secondary_entry);
 	int err = psci_ops.cpu_on(cpu_logical_map(cpu), pa_secondary_entry);
-	if (err)
+	if (err && err != -EPERM)
 		pr_err("failed to boot CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu, err);
 
 	return err;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 4ced34f62dab..dc0e0b3ec2d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
 	/* Now bring the CPU into our world */
 	ret = boot_secondary(cpu, idle);
 	if (ret) {
-		pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret);
+		if (ret != -EPERM)
+			pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2