[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUo96EABpH6=7i2cXFmZhAB2MM=UsnG-+vL4HJtLGS=bA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:53:06 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>, Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/11] perf/core: Add ability for an event to "pause"
or "resume" AUX area tracing
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:49 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/01/24 10:19, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Hardware traces, such as instruction traces, can produce a vast amount of
> > trace data, so being able to reduce tracing to more specific circumstances
> > can be useful.
> >
> > The ability to pause or resume tracing when another event happens, can do
> > that.
> >
> > These patches add such a facilty and show how it would work for Intel
> > Processor Trace.
> >
> > Maintainers of other AUX area tracing implementations are requested to
> > consider if this is something they might employ and then whether or not
> > the ABI would work for them.
> >
> > Changes to perf tools are now (since V4) fleshed out.
> >
> >
> > Changes in V4:
> >
> > perf/core: Add aux_pause, aux_resume, aux_start_paused
> > Rename aux_output_cfg -> aux_action
> > Reorder aux_action bits from:
> > aux_pause, aux_resume, aux_start_paused
> > to:
> > aux_start_paused, aux_pause, aux_resume
> > Fix aux_action bits __u64 -> __u32
> >
> > coresight: Have a stab at support for pause / resume
> > Dropped
> >
> > perf tools
> > All new patches
> >
> > Changes in RFC V3:
> >
> > coresight: Have a stab at support for pause / resume
> > 'mode' -> 'flags' so it at least compiles
> >
> > Changes in RFC V2:
> >
> > Use ->stop() / ->start() instead of ->pause_resume()
> > Move aux_start_paused bit into aux_output_cfg
> > Tighten up when Intel PT pause / resume is allowed
> > Add an example of how it might work for CoreSight
>
> Any more comments?
I think the tools side looks good. The parsing changes match the
existing style. I wonder if it wouldn't be better to handle the valid
strings (pause, resume, etc.) in the lexer rather than a separate
parse function, but the pattern used matches the existing one. You can
have my Acked-by on the tools changes, although the subtleties of ARM
PMUs makes me somewhat nervous in this regard.
Thanks,
Ian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists