linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] [eventfs] 852e46e239: BUG:unable_to_handle_page_fault_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:28:44 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
 lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu
 Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Christian Brauner
 <brauner@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ajay Kaher
 <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [eventfs] 852e46e239:
 BUG:unable_to_handle_page_fault_for_address

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:13:58 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:58:47 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -788,6 +717,7 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
> >  {
> >  	struct tracefs_inode *ti = (struct tracefs_inode *) foo;
> >  
> > +	memset(ti, 0, sizeof(*ti));
> >  	inode_init_once(&ti->vfs_inode);
> >  }
> >    
> 
> Note, that inode_init_once() also does a memset on the entire inode, so the
> initial memset is redundant on the inode portion. But I didn't think it was
> really worth the time to complicate the code by optimizing it. I guess if I
> changed the structure to:
> 
>  struct tracefs_inode {
> +	struct inode            vfs_inode;
> 	unsigned long           flags;
> 	void                    *private;
> -	struct inode            vfs_inode;
>  };
> 
> I could have it do:
> 
> 	memset_after(ti, 0, vfs_inode);
> 
> But this can be done as a separate clean up and doesn't need to be done now.
> 

Hmm, since I need to run all the tests again, I think I'll change this
patch to do the above.

-- Steve