[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <953f6b82-c4b1-43f7-af68-e504d663f070@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 19:26:48 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com>
Cc: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] Improve GbEth performance on Renesas RZ/G2L
and related SoCs
> Changes are made specific to the GbEth IP, avoiding potential impact on
> the other Renesas R-Car based SoCs which also use the ravb driver. This
> follows the principle of only submitting patches that we can fully test.
Are you saying that Renesas does not have access to all Renesas RDKs?
I don't particularly like the way your first patch makes a copy of
shared functions. Is it not likely that R-Car would also benefit from
this?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists