| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3A58BAAB108DEC6B+ZbmuKg9jkVmHHN0Y@centos8>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:19:22 +0800
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, fancer.lancer@...il.com, lkp@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, set_pte_at@...look.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: eeprom/idt_89hpesx: Convert data structures to LE
explicitly
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:07:18PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 09:34:52AM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:04:17AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:06:32PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
> > > > For data structures needs cpu_to_le* conversion, its prototype needs to
> > > > be declared with __le* explicitly.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: cfad6425382e ("eeprom: Add IDT 89HPESx EEPROM/CSR driver")
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401261250.b07Yt30Z-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
> > > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c | 6 +++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
> > > > index d807d08e2614..327afb866b21 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c
> > > > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ struct idt_smb_seq {
> > > > struct idt_eeprom_seq {
> > > > u8 cmd;
> > > > u8 eeaddr;
> > > > - u16 memaddr;
> > > > + __le16 memaddr;
> > > > u8 data;
> > > > } __packed;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ struct idt_eeprom_seq {
> > > > */
> > > > struct idt_csr_seq {
> > > > u8 cmd;
> > > > - u16 csraddr;
> > > > - u32 data;
> > > > + __le16 csraddr;
> > > > + __le32 data;
> > > > } __packed;
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > >
> > > Declaring them this way is nice, but this doesn't actually "fix"
> > > anything at all as no code is actually changed.
> > >
> > > So how is ths a bugfix? How does this patch do anything?
> > >
> > > confused,
> >
> > Sorry for the confuson.
> >
> > This commit is to address the issue reported by kernel test rebot[1].
> >
> > Partially quoted from it:
> >
> > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:599:31: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] memaddr @@ got restricted __le16 [usertype] @@
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:599:31: sparse: expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] memaddr
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:599:31: sparse: got restricted __le16 [usertype]
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:671:31: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] memaddr @@ got restricted __le16 [usertype] @@
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:671:31: sparse: expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] memaddr
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:671:31: sparse: got restricted __le16 [usertype]
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:769:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] csraddr @@ got restricted __le16 [usertype] @@
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:769:24: sparse: expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] csraddr
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:769:24: sparse: got restricted __le16 [usertype]
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:770:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] data @@ got restricted __le32 [usertype] @@
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:770:21: sparse: expected unsigned int [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] data
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:770:21: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype]
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:834:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] csraddr @@ got restricted __le16 [usertype] @@
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:834:24: sparse: expected unsigned short [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] csraddr
> > drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:834:24: sparse: got restricted __le16 [usertype]
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
> > >> drivers/misc/eeprom/idt_89hpesx.c:859:17: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401261250.b07Yt30Z-lkp@intel.com/
>
> Ok, so this fixes a sparse issue, how is that needed for stable kernels?
>
> Please be more explicit about what you are "fixing" in the changelog
> please, as-is this didn't make any sense to me.
Yes, it's my fault not making it clear in commit message. Sorry for
that.
>
> Please fix up and send a v2.
Will do that.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Thanks,
Dawei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists