[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240131211227.GA2303754-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:12:27 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
Cc: frowand.list@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, set_pte_at@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: Implment cache update operation on device node
attach
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:52:36PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
> Use implemented __of_phandle_update_cache to update phandle cache on
> device node attachment.
>
> While at it, make explicit assertion on locking dependency for
> __of_phandle_cache_inv_entry.
'While at it' is a red flag for should be a separate commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/of/dynamic.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 8b7da27835eb..44e542b566e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ void __of_phandle_cache_inv_entry(phandle handle)
> u32 handle_hash;
> struct device_node *np;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&devtree_lock);
> +
> if (!handle)
> return;
>
> @@ -195,8 +197,8 @@ void __init of_core_init(void)
> }
> for_each_of_allnodes(np) {
> __of_attach_node_sysfs(np);
> - if (np->phandle && !phandle_cache[of_phandle_cache_hash(np->phandle)])
> - phandle_cache[of_phandle_cache_hash(np->phandle)] = np;
> +
> + __of_phandle_update_cache(np, false);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&of_mutex);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> index 3bf27052832f..a68bf58f2c24 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ static void __of_attach_node(struct device_node *np)
> np->phandle = 0;
> }
>
> + __of_phandle_update_cache(np, true);
> +
> np->child = NULL;
> np->sibling = np->parent->child;
> np->parent->child = np;
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists