[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f9b1f85-560a-402f-a813-7962218dce96@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 21:52:02 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@....com,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active
enforcement for unbound workqueues
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:24:51PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Ah, I see. How about the following?
>
> Thanks.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 9221a4c57ae1..31c1373505d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ static void wq_update_node_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int off_cpu)
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
>
> - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(off_cpu, effective))
> + if (off_cpu >= 0 && !cpumask_test_cpu(off_cpu, effective))
> off_cpu = -1;
This commit was also breaking at91sam9g20ek (and still is in today's
-next), the fix here gets that booting again:
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists